TY - JOUR
T1 - A 10-year experience of managing ureteric calculi
T2 - Changing trends towards endourological intervention - Is there a role for open surgery?
AU - Ather, M. H.
AU - Paryani, J.
AU - Memon, A.
AU - Sulaiman, M. N.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Objectives: To study changing practices in the management of ureterolithiasis with the introduction of newer technologies, the efficacy and safety of endourology, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and open surgery, and to determine if any indication remains for open ureterolithotomy in a tertiary endourology unit. Patients and methods: A 12-year retrospective review (1987-1998) was conducted of all primary ureteric stones treated by ESWL, endoscopy, intracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ISWL) administered via ureteroscopy, and open surgery. Results: In all, 1195 patients were treated for primary ureteric stones, 44% by ESWL, 37% by ureteroscopy and ISWL, and 20% by open surgery. At the 3-month follow-up the stone-free rates for ESWL monotherapy, ureteroscopy and open surgery were 95%, 85% and 97%, giving an efficiency quotient of 73%, 64% and 94%, respectively. The overall complication rate for ESWL was 13%, for ISWL 32% and for open surgery 13%, but the complications of open surgery were often serious and potentially life-threatening. Conclusions: With recent advances in endourology the indications for open surgery have decreased considerably, from 26% in 1987-95 to 8% in 1996-98. However, the remaining indications for open ureterolithotomy include failure of less invasive modalities, the presence of medical/anatomical abnormalities, a concomitant open procedure, and the presence of large impacted calculi for which patients prefer to avoid multiple procedures.
AB - Objectives: To study changing practices in the management of ureterolithiasis with the introduction of newer technologies, the efficacy and safety of endourology, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and open surgery, and to determine if any indication remains for open ureterolithotomy in a tertiary endourology unit. Patients and methods: A 12-year retrospective review (1987-1998) was conducted of all primary ureteric stones treated by ESWL, endoscopy, intracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ISWL) administered via ureteroscopy, and open surgery. Results: In all, 1195 patients were treated for primary ureteric stones, 44% by ESWL, 37% by ureteroscopy and ISWL, and 20% by open surgery. At the 3-month follow-up the stone-free rates for ESWL monotherapy, ureteroscopy and open surgery were 95%, 85% and 97%, giving an efficiency quotient of 73%, 64% and 94%, respectively. The overall complication rate for ESWL was 13%, for ISWL 32% and for open surgery 13%, but the complications of open surgery were often serious and potentially life-threatening. Conclusions: With recent advances in endourology the indications for open surgery have decreased considerably, from 26% in 1987-95 to 8% in 1996-98. However, the remaining indications for open ureterolithotomy include failure of less invasive modalities, the presence of medical/anatomical abnormalities, a concomitant open procedure, and the presence of large impacted calculi for which patients prefer to avoid multiple procedures.
KW - Efficiency quotient
KW - Extracorporeal lithotripsy
KW - Ureteric stone
KW - Ureterolithotomy
KW - Ureteroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034826719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.02302.x
DO - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.02302.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 11488723
AN - SCOPUS:0034826719
SN - 1464-4096
VL - 88
SP - 173
EP - 177
JO - BJU International
JF - BJU International
IS - 3
ER -