A review of soil carbon dynamics resulting from agricultural practices

Farhat Abbas, Hafiz Mohkum Hammad, Wajid Ishaq, Aitazaz Ahsan Farooque, Hafiz Faiq Bakhat, Zahida Zia, Shah Fahad, Wajid Farhad, Artemi Cerdà

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

112 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Literature related to the carbon cycle and climate contains contradictory results with regard to whether agricultural practices increase or mitigate emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). One opinion is that anthropogenic activities have distinct carbon footprints – measured as total emissions of GHGs resulting from an activity, in this case, “agricultural operations”. In contrast, it is argued that agriculture potentially serves to mitigate GHGs emissions when the best management practices are implemented. We review the literature on agricultural carbon footprints in the context of agricultural practices including soil, water and nutrient management. It has been reported that the management practices that enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) in arid and semi-arid areas include conversion of conventional tillage practices to conservation tillage approaches. We found that agricultural management in arid and semi-arid regions, which have specific characteristics related to high temperatures and low rainfall conditions, requires different practices for maintenance and restoration of SOC and for control of soil erosion compared to those used in Mediterranean, tropical regions. We recommend that in order to meet the global climate targets, quantification of net global warming potential of agricultural practices requires precise estimates of local, regional and global carbon budgets. We have conducted and present a case study for observing the development of deep soil carbon profile resulting from a 10-year wheat-cotton and wheat-maize rotation on semi-arid lands. Results showed that no tillage with mulch application had 14% (37.2 vs 43.3 Mg ha−1) higher SOC stocks in comparison to conventional tillage with mulch application. By implementing no tillage in conjunction with mulch application, lower carbon losses from soil can mitigate the risks associated with global warming. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider agricultural practices and soil erosion after a land-use change when calculating global carbon footprints.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110319
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume268
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Carbon footprints
  • Semi-arid lands
  • Soil erosion
  • Soil tillage practices

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of soil carbon dynamics resulting from agricultural practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this