TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of soil carbon dynamics resulting from agricultural practices
AU - Abbas, Farhat
AU - Hammad, Hafiz Mohkum
AU - Ishaq, Wajid
AU - Farooque, Aitazaz Ahsan
AU - Bakhat, Hafiz Faiq
AU - Zia, Zahida
AU - Fahad, Shah
AU - Farhad, Wajid
AU - Cerdà, Artemi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge Deborah A. Martin, Research Hydrologist, Emerita, U.S. Geological Survey, 3215 Marine Street, Boulder, CO, USA for the English language improvement of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/8/15
Y1 - 2020/8/15
N2 - Literature related to the carbon cycle and climate contains contradictory results with regard to whether agricultural practices increase or mitigate emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). One opinion is that anthropogenic activities have distinct carbon footprints – measured as total emissions of GHGs resulting from an activity, in this case, “agricultural operations”. In contrast, it is argued that agriculture potentially serves to mitigate GHGs emissions when the best management practices are implemented. We review the literature on agricultural carbon footprints in the context of agricultural practices including soil, water and nutrient management. It has been reported that the management practices that enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) in arid and semi-arid areas include conversion of conventional tillage practices to conservation tillage approaches. We found that agricultural management in arid and semi-arid regions, which have specific characteristics related to high temperatures and low rainfall conditions, requires different practices for maintenance and restoration of SOC and for control of soil erosion compared to those used in Mediterranean, tropical regions. We recommend that in order to meet the global climate targets, quantification of net global warming potential of agricultural practices requires precise estimates of local, regional and global carbon budgets. We have conducted and present a case study for observing the development of deep soil carbon profile resulting from a 10-year wheat-cotton and wheat-maize rotation on semi-arid lands. Results showed that no tillage with mulch application had 14% (37.2 vs 43.3 Mg ha−1) higher SOC stocks in comparison to conventional tillage with mulch application. By implementing no tillage in conjunction with mulch application, lower carbon losses from soil can mitigate the risks associated with global warming. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider agricultural practices and soil erosion after a land-use change when calculating global carbon footprints.
AB - Literature related to the carbon cycle and climate contains contradictory results with regard to whether agricultural practices increase or mitigate emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). One opinion is that anthropogenic activities have distinct carbon footprints – measured as total emissions of GHGs resulting from an activity, in this case, “agricultural operations”. In contrast, it is argued that agriculture potentially serves to mitigate GHGs emissions when the best management practices are implemented. We review the literature on agricultural carbon footprints in the context of agricultural practices including soil, water and nutrient management. It has been reported that the management practices that enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) in arid and semi-arid areas include conversion of conventional tillage practices to conservation tillage approaches. We found that agricultural management in arid and semi-arid regions, which have specific characteristics related to high temperatures and low rainfall conditions, requires different practices for maintenance and restoration of SOC and for control of soil erosion compared to those used in Mediterranean, tropical regions. We recommend that in order to meet the global climate targets, quantification of net global warming potential of agricultural practices requires precise estimates of local, regional and global carbon budgets. We have conducted and present a case study for observing the development of deep soil carbon profile resulting from a 10-year wheat-cotton and wheat-maize rotation on semi-arid lands. Results showed that no tillage with mulch application had 14% (37.2 vs 43.3 Mg ha−1) higher SOC stocks in comparison to conventional tillage with mulch application. By implementing no tillage in conjunction with mulch application, lower carbon losses from soil can mitigate the risks associated with global warming. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider agricultural practices and soil erosion after a land-use change when calculating global carbon footprints.
KW - Carbon footprints
KW - Semi-arid lands
KW - Soil erosion
KW - Soil tillage practices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084256705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110319
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110319
M3 - Article
C2 - 32510455
AN - SCOPUS:85084256705
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 268
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 110319
ER -