TY - JOUR
T1 - A scoping review of the literature of research ethics committees and ethics review framework in Pakistan
T2 - What we know and what we still need to learn
AU - Asif, Farah
AU - Sultan, Faisal
AU - Masood, Iqra
AU - Baig, Shahtaj
AU - Ekmecki, Perihan Elif
AU - Vaswani, Vina
AU - Bhutta, Zulfiqar
AU - Crawley, Francis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Pakistan Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Objective: To map literature on research ethics committees, institutional review boards and ethics review framework in Pakistan to identify key insights during public health emergencies and normal times. Method: The systematic scoping review was conducted in April 2022, and comprised literature search on PubMed, World Health Organisation Global Index Medicus and Summons databases for articles published between January 2005 and February 2022. Information extracted included authors names, year of publication, title, study methodology, and key insights under the heads of challenges and solutions. Due to data heterogeneity, key themes were identified and analysed. Results: Of the 2,190 studies initially identified, 21(0.95%) were subjected to full-Text review, and, from among them, 9(45%) were analysed in detail. There were 4 key insights identified: research ethics committees and institutional review boards in Pakistan remain unregulated as they are currently not registered or accredited by a competent national-level authority; most members of such committees are not formally trained to implement the mandate; internal and external pressures hinder independent decision-making of such committees; and other issues hindering the functionality and performance of research ethics committees and institutional review boards. Conclusion: Despite existing publications calling for urgent policy and regulatory reforms, there is a dearth of literature and minimal policy actions underlying the fact that ethics review remains a neglected area in Pakistan.
AB - Objective: To map literature on research ethics committees, institutional review boards and ethics review framework in Pakistan to identify key insights during public health emergencies and normal times. Method: The systematic scoping review was conducted in April 2022, and comprised literature search on PubMed, World Health Organisation Global Index Medicus and Summons databases for articles published between January 2005 and February 2022. Information extracted included authors names, year of publication, title, study methodology, and key insights under the heads of challenges and solutions. Due to data heterogeneity, key themes were identified and analysed. Results: Of the 2,190 studies initially identified, 21(0.95%) were subjected to full-Text review, and, from among them, 9(45%) were analysed in detail. There were 4 key insights identified: research ethics committees and institutional review boards in Pakistan remain unregulated as they are currently not registered or accredited by a competent national-level authority; most members of such committees are not formally trained to implement the mandate; internal and external pressures hinder independent decision-making of such committees; and other issues hindering the functionality and performance of research ethics committees and institutional review boards. Conclusion: Despite existing publications calling for urgent policy and regulatory reforms, there is a dearth of literature and minimal policy actions underlying the fact that ethics review remains a neglected area in Pakistan.
KW - Bioethics
KW - Ethics
KW - Ethics committees
KW - Institutional review board
KW - Pakistan
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165783896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.47391/JPMA.8033
DO - 10.47391/JPMA.8033
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85165783896
SN - 0030-9982
VL - 73
SP - 1667
EP - 1674
JO - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
IS - 8
ER -