TY - JOUR
T1 - A shortened verbal autopsy instrument for use in routine mortality surveillance systems
AU - Serina, Peter
AU - Riley, Ian
AU - Stewart, Andrea
AU - Flaxman, Abraham D.
AU - Lozano, Rafael
AU - Mooney, Meghan D.
AU - Luning, Richard
AU - Hernandez, Bernardo
AU - Black, Robert
AU - Ahuja, Ramesh
AU - Alam, Nurul
AU - Alam, Sayed Saidul
AU - Ali, Said Mohammed
AU - Atkinson, Charles
AU - Baqui, Abdulla H.
AU - Chowdhury, Hafizur R.
AU - Dandona, Lalit
AU - Dandona, Rakhi
AU - Dantzer, Emily
AU - Darmstadt, Gary L.
AU - Das, Vinita
AU - Dhingra, Usha
AU - Dutta, Arup
AU - Fawzi, Wafaie
AU - Freeman, Michael
AU - Gamage, Saman
AU - Gomez, Sara
AU - Hensman, Dilip
AU - James, Spencer L.
AU - Joshi, Rohina
AU - Kalter, Henry D.
AU - Kumar, Aarti
AU - Kumar, Vishwajeet
AU - Lucero, Marilla
AU - Mehta, Saurabh
AU - Neal, Bruce
AU - Ohno, Summer Lockett
AU - Phillips, David
AU - Pierce, Kelsey
AU - Prasad, Rajendra
AU - Praveen, Devarsetty
AU - Premji, Zul
AU - Ramirez-Villalobos, Dolores
AU - Rampatige, Rasika
AU - Remolador, Hazel
AU - Romero, Minerva
AU - Said, Mwanaidi
AU - Sanvictores, Diozele
AU - Sazawal, Sunil
AU - Streatfield, Peter K.
AU - Tallo, Veronica
AU - Vadhatpour, Alireza
AU - Wijesekara, Nandalal
AU - Murray, Christopher J.L.
AU - Lopez, Alan D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Serina et al.
PY - 2015/12/16
Y1 - 2015/12/16
N2 - Background: Verbal autopsy (VA) is recognized as the only feasible alternative to comprehensive medical certification of deaths in settings with no or unreliable vital registration systems. However, a barrier to its use by national registration systems has been the amount of time and cost needed for data collection. Therefore, a short VA instrument (VAI) is needed. In this paper we describe a shortened version of the VAI developed for the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC) Gold Standard Verbal Autopsy Validation Study using a systematic approach. Methods: We used data from the PHMRC validation study. Using the Tariff 2.0 method, we first established a rank order of individual questions in the PHMRC VAI according to their importance in predicting causes of death. Second, we reduced the size of the instrument by dropping questions in reverse order of their importance. We assessed the predictive performance of the instrument as questions were removed at the individual level by calculating chance-corrected concordance and at the population level with cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy. Finally, the optimum size of the shortened instrument was determined using a first derivative analysis of the decline in performance as the size of the VA instrument decreased for adults, children, and neonates. Results: The full PHMRC VAI had 183, 127, and 149 questions for adult, child, and neonatal deaths, respectively. The shortened instrument developed had 109, 69, and 67 questions, respectively, representing a decrease in the total number of questions of 40-55 %. The shortened instrument, with text, showed non-significant declines in CSMF accuracy from the full instrument with text of 0.4 %, 0.0 %, and 0.6 % for the adult, child, and neonatal modules, respectively. Conclusions: We developed a shortened VAI using a systematic approach, and assessed its performance when administered using hand-held electronic tablets and analyzed using Tariff 2.0. The length of a VA questionnaire was shortened by almost 50 % without a significant drop in performance. The shortened VAI developed reduces the burden of time and resources required for data collection and analysis of cause of death data in civil registration systems.
AB - Background: Verbal autopsy (VA) is recognized as the only feasible alternative to comprehensive medical certification of deaths in settings with no or unreliable vital registration systems. However, a barrier to its use by national registration systems has been the amount of time and cost needed for data collection. Therefore, a short VA instrument (VAI) is needed. In this paper we describe a shortened version of the VAI developed for the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC) Gold Standard Verbal Autopsy Validation Study using a systematic approach. Methods: We used data from the PHMRC validation study. Using the Tariff 2.0 method, we first established a rank order of individual questions in the PHMRC VAI according to their importance in predicting causes of death. Second, we reduced the size of the instrument by dropping questions in reverse order of their importance. We assessed the predictive performance of the instrument as questions were removed at the individual level by calculating chance-corrected concordance and at the population level with cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy. Finally, the optimum size of the shortened instrument was determined using a first derivative analysis of the decline in performance as the size of the VA instrument decreased for adults, children, and neonates. Results: The full PHMRC VAI had 183, 127, and 149 questions for adult, child, and neonatal deaths, respectively. The shortened instrument developed had 109, 69, and 67 questions, respectively, representing a decrease in the total number of questions of 40-55 %. The shortened instrument, with text, showed non-significant declines in CSMF accuracy from the full instrument with text of 0.4 %, 0.0 %, and 0.6 % for the adult, child, and neonatal modules, respectively. Conclusions: We developed a shortened VAI using a systematic approach, and assessed its performance when administered using hand-held electronic tablets and analyzed using Tariff 2.0. The length of a VA questionnaire was shortened by almost 50 % without a significant drop in performance. The shortened VAI developed reduces the burden of time and resources required for data collection and analysis of cause of death data in civil registration systems.
KW - Causes of death
KW - Mortality surveillance
KW - Verbal autopsy questionnaire
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973410106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12916-015-0528-8
DO - 10.1186/s12916-015-0528-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 26670275
AN - SCOPUS:84973410106
SN - 1741-7015
VL - 13
JO - BMC Medicine
JF - BMC Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 302
ER -