TY - JOUR
T1 - An Approach to Improve the Negative Predictive Value and Clinical Utility of Transthoracic Echocardiography in Suspected Native Valve Infective Endocarditis
AU - Sivak, Joseph A.
AU - Vora, Amit N.
AU - Navar, Ann Marie
AU - Schulte, Phillip J.
AU - Crowley, Anna Lisa
AU - Kisslo, Joseph
AU - Corey, G. Ralph
AU - Liao, Lawrence
AU - Wang, Andrew
AU - Velazquez, Eric J.
AU - Samad, Zainab
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Society of Echocardiography
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Background In patients with suspected native valve infective endocarditis, current guidelines recommend initial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) if clinical suspicion remains. The guidelines do not account for the quality of initial TTE or other findings that may alter the study's diagnostic characteristics. This may lead to unnecessary TEE when initial TTE was sufficient to rule out vegetation. Methods The objective of this study was to determine if the use of a strict definition of negative results on TTE would improve the performance characteristics of TTE sufficiently to exclude vegetation. A retrospective analysis of patients at a single institution with suspected native valve endocarditis who underwent TTE followed by TEE within 7 days between January 1, 2007, and February 28, 2014, was performed. Negative results on TTE for vegetation were defined by either the standard approach (no evidence of vegetation seen on TTE) or by applying a set of strict negative criteria incorporating other findings on TTE. Using TEE as the gold standard for the presence of vegetation, the diagnostic performance of the two transthoracic approaches was compared. Results In total, 790 pairs of TTE and TEE were identified. With the standard approach, 661 of the transthoracic studies had negative findings (no vegetation seen), compared with 104 studies with negative findings using the strict negative approach (meeting all strict negative criteria). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of TTE for detecting vegetation were substantially improved using the strict negative approach (sensitivity, 98% [95% CI, 95%–99%] vs 43% [95% CI, 36%–51%]; negative predictive value, 97% [95% CI, 92%–99%] vs 87% [95% CI, 84%–89%]). Conclusions The ability of TTE to exclude vegetation in patients is excellent when strict criteria for negative results are applied. In patients at low to intermediate risk with strict negative results on TTE, follow-up TEE may be unnecessary.
AB - Background In patients with suspected native valve infective endocarditis, current guidelines recommend initial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) if clinical suspicion remains. The guidelines do not account for the quality of initial TTE or other findings that may alter the study's diagnostic characteristics. This may lead to unnecessary TEE when initial TTE was sufficient to rule out vegetation. Methods The objective of this study was to determine if the use of a strict definition of negative results on TTE would improve the performance characteristics of TTE sufficiently to exclude vegetation. A retrospective analysis of patients at a single institution with suspected native valve endocarditis who underwent TTE followed by TEE within 7 days between January 1, 2007, and February 28, 2014, was performed. Negative results on TTE for vegetation were defined by either the standard approach (no evidence of vegetation seen on TTE) or by applying a set of strict negative criteria incorporating other findings on TTE. Using TEE as the gold standard for the presence of vegetation, the diagnostic performance of the two transthoracic approaches was compared. Results In total, 790 pairs of TTE and TEE were identified. With the standard approach, 661 of the transthoracic studies had negative findings (no vegetation seen), compared with 104 studies with negative findings using the strict negative approach (meeting all strict negative criteria). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of TTE for detecting vegetation were substantially improved using the strict negative approach (sensitivity, 98% [95% CI, 95%–99%] vs 43% [95% CI, 36%–51%]; negative predictive value, 97% [95% CI, 92%–99%] vs 87% [95% CI, 84%–89%]). Conclusions The ability of TTE to exclude vegetation in patients is excellent when strict criteria for negative results are applied. In patients at low to intermediate risk with strict negative results on TTE, follow-up TEE may be unnecessary.
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Infective endocarditis
KW - Screening
KW - Transesophageal echocardiography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956668819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2015.12.009
DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2015.12.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 26850679
AN - SCOPUS:84956668819
SN - 0894-7317
VL - 29
SP - 315
EP - 322
JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
IS - 4
ER -