TY - JOUR
T1 - An audit of transfusion reaction monitoring and reporting at a cancer hospital in Pakistan a step towards haemovigilance
AU - Hasan, Muhammad
AU - Siddiqui, Imran Ahmed
AU - Qamar, Zahid
AU - Hayat, Asad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Pakistan Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Objective: To monitor the frequencies of different adverse transfusion reactions and to assess the compliance of clinical staff with the process of sending proper transfusion reaction workup within the specified time. Methods: The retrospective audit was conducted at the blood bank of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised all transfusion reaction forms received from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018. The forms were analysed for type of blood component, time in which it was received by the blood bank, whether or not the form was completely filled, whether or not all required samples were provided, and the type of reaction. Results: Of the 12,787 units dispensed and transfused, 50(0.39%) transfusion reactions were noted. Allergic was the most frequent type 24(48%). Red cells accounted for 38(76%) of the reactions. In 58(95%) cases, reaction forms were completely filled. Blood bags in 36(59%) and post-Transfusion ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid samples in 35(57.3%) cases were received at blood bank within 2 hours of reaction. Conclusion: Incidence of transfusion reactions was found to be low as there was good compliance with procedures on the part of the clinical staff.
AB - Objective: To monitor the frequencies of different adverse transfusion reactions and to assess the compliance of clinical staff with the process of sending proper transfusion reaction workup within the specified time. Methods: The retrospective audit was conducted at the blood bank of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised all transfusion reaction forms received from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018. The forms were analysed for type of blood component, time in which it was received by the blood bank, whether or not the form was completely filled, whether or not all required samples were provided, and the type of reaction. Results: Of the 12,787 units dispensed and transfused, 50(0.39%) transfusion reactions were noted. Allergic was the most frequent type 24(48%). Red cells accounted for 38(76%) of the reactions. In 58(95%) cases, reaction forms were completely filled. Blood bags in 36(59%) and post-Transfusion ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid samples in 35(57.3%) cases were received at blood bank within 2 hours of reaction. Conclusion: Incidence of transfusion reactions was found to be low as there was good compliance with procedures on the part of the clinical staff.
KW - Clinical audit
KW - Haemo-vigilance
KW - Transfusion reactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105300362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.47391/JPMA.1185
DO - 10.47391/JPMA.1185
M3 - Article
C2 - 33941962
AN - SCOPUS:85105300362
SN - 0030-9982
VL - 71
SP - 699
EP - 703
JO - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
IS - 2
ER -