TY - JOUR
T1 - Are Kenyans Likely to Use COVID-19 Self-Testing Kits? Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey
AU - Manguro, Griffins
AU - Shilton, Sonjelle
AU - Omenda, Sharon
AU - Owira, Patrica
AU - Batheja, Deepshikha
AU - Banerji, Abhik
AU - Chabeda, Sophie Vusha
AU - Temmerman, Marleen
AU - Jako, Walter
AU - Ndungu, Joseph
AU - Luchters, Stanley
AU - Ivanova Reipold, Elena
AU - Martínez-Pérez, Guillermo Z.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Manguro, Shilton, Omenda, Owira, Batheja, Banerji, Chabeda, Temmerman, Jako, Ndungu, Luchters, Ivanova Reipold and Martínez-Pérez.
PY - 2022/8/26
Y1 - 2022/8/26
N2 - Objectives: To understand the public’s perceptions around rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen self-testing in Kenya, including the drivers of acceptability, willingness to pay, and adherence to hygiene and prevention recommendations following a positive self-test. Methods: A household-based, cross-sectional survey, using a 35-item questionnaire, was conducted in Mombasa and Taita–Taveta counties, Kenya, during August 2021. Individuals aged ≥18 years were enrolled using a stratified sampling approach. Results: There were 419 participants (mean age 35.7 years). A minority (10.5%) had ever tested for SARS-CoV-2. If SARS-CoV-2 self-testing were available, 39.9% and 41.5% would be likely and very likely, respectively, to use it. If unavailable free-of-charge, 63.01% would pay for it. Multivariate analyses suggested that people in rural areas (Coefficient 0.30, 95%CI: 0.11–0.48, p = 0.002), aged 36–55 (Coefficient 0.21, 95%CI: 0.03–0.40, p = 0.023), and employed full time (Coefficient 0.32, 95%CI: 0.06–0.58, p = 0.016) would have more odds to adhere to recommended hygiene and prevention actions. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 self-testing was considered acceptable. Availability of self-testing could expand access to COVID-19 testing in Kenya, particularly among rural communities who have limited access to testing, and among mildly symptomatic individuals.
AB - Objectives: To understand the public’s perceptions around rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen self-testing in Kenya, including the drivers of acceptability, willingness to pay, and adherence to hygiene and prevention recommendations following a positive self-test. Methods: A household-based, cross-sectional survey, using a 35-item questionnaire, was conducted in Mombasa and Taita–Taveta counties, Kenya, during August 2021. Individuals aged ≥18 years were enrolled using a stratified sampling approach. Results: There were 419 participants (mean age 35.7 years). A minority (10.5%) had ever tested for SARS-CoV-2. If SARS-CoV-2 self-testing were available, 39.9% and 41.5% would be likely and very likely, respectively, to use it. If unavailable free-of-charge, 63.01% would pay for it. Multivariate analyses suggested that people in rural areas (Coefficient 0.30, 95%CI: 0.11–0.48, p = 0.002), aged 36–55 (Coefficient 0.21, 95%CI: 0.03–0.40, p = 0.023), and employed full time (Coefficient 0.32, 95%CI: 0.06–0.58, p = 0.016) would have more odds to adhere to recommended hygiene and prevention actions. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 self-testing was considered acceptable. Availability of self-testing could expand access to COVID-19 testing in Kenya, particularly among rural communities who have limited access to testing, and among mildly symptomatic individuals.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Kenya
KW - SARS-CoV-2 testing
KW - home diagnostics
KW - self-testing
KW - survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137594517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604918
DO - 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604918
M3 - Article
C2 - 36090834
AN - SCOPUS:85137594517
SN - 1661-8556
VL - 67
JO - International Journal of Public Health
JF - International Journal of Public Health
M1 - 1604918
ER -