Association of Hospital Procedural Volume With Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement

  • SHAZIB SAGHEER
  • , ABDUL MANNAN KHAN MINHAS
  • , SYEDA HUMNA ZAIDI
  • , ISHAN SHAH
  • , KEERAT RAI AHUJA
  • , SATISH KUMAR AHUJA
  • , SALIK NAZIR
  • , KHAWAJA M. TALHA
  • , SOURBHA S. DANI
  • , MARAT FUDIM
  • , DMITRY ABRAMOV
  • , SALIM S. VIRANI
  • , NAJAM WASTY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: With the advancement in device technology, the use of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has increased significantly in recent years. However, there is a dearth of evidence to conclude whether patients who undergo LVAD implantation at high-volume centers have better clinical outcomes than those receiving care at low- or medium-volume centers. Methods: We analyzed the hospitalizations using the Nationwide Readmission Database for the year 2019 for new LVAD implantation. Baseline comorbidities and hospital characteristics were compared among low- (1–5 procedures/year), medium- (6–16 procedures/year) and high-volume (17–72 procedures/year) hospitals. The volume/outcome relationship was analyzed using the annualized hospital volume as a categorical variable (tertiles) as well as a continuous variable. Multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression and negative binomial regression models were used to determine the association of hospital volume and outcomes, with tertile 1 (low-volume hospitals) as the reference category. Results: A total of 1533 new LVAD procedures were included in the analysis. The inpatient mortality rate was lower in the high-volume centers compared with the low-volume centers (9.04% vs 18.49%, aOR 0.41, CI0.21–0.80; P = 0.009). There was a trend toward lower mortality rates in medium-volume centers compared with low-volume centers; however, it did not reach statistical significance (13.27% vs 18.49%, aOR 0.57, CI0.27–1.23; P = 0.153). Similar results were seen for major adverse events (composite of stroke/transient ischemic attack and in-hospital mortality). There was no significant difference in bleeding/transfusion, acute kidney injury, vascular complications, pericardial effusion/hemopericardium/tamponade, length of stay, cost, or 30-day readmission rates between medium- and high-volume centers compared to low-volume centers. Conclusion: Our findings indicate lower inpatient mortality rates in high-volume LVAD implantation centers and a trend toward lower mortality rates in medium-volume LVAD implantation centers compared to lower-volume centers.

Original languageEnglish (UK)
Pages (from-to)1531-1538
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiac Failure
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • LVAD
  • implantation
  • inpatient outcomes
  • volume

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of Hospital Procedural Volume With Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this