@article{8bdb6010eb3b48a38cb345c938ea58a2,
title = "Attitudes and perceptions among urban South Africans towards sugar-sweetened beverages and taxation",
abstract = "Objective: A tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) was introduced in South Africa in April 2018. Our objective was to document perceptions and attitudes among urban South Africans living in Soweto on factors that contribute to their SSB intake and on South Africa's use of a tax to reduce SSB consumption.Design: We conducted six focus group discussions using a semi-structured guide.Setting: The study was conducted in Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa, 3 months before South Africa's SSB tax was implemented.Participants: Adults aged 18 years or above living in Soweto (n 57).Results: Participants reported frequent SSB consumption and attributed this to habit, addiction, advertising and wide accessibility of SSB. Most of the participants were not aware of the proposed SSB tax; when made aware of the tax, their responses included both beliefs that it would and would not result in reduced SSB intake. However, participants indicated cynicism with regard to the government's stated motivation in introducing the tax for health rather than revenue reasons.Conclusions: While an SSB tax is a policy tool that could be used with other strategies to reduce people's high level of SSB consumption in Soweto, our findings suggest a need to complement the SSB tax with a multipronged behaviour change strategy. This strategy could include both environmental and individual levers to reduce SSB consumption and its associated risks.",
keywords = "South Africa, Sugar-sweetened beverages, Taxation",
author = "Bosire, {Edna N.} and Nicholas Stacey and Gudani Mukoma and Aviva Tugendhaft and Karen Hofman and Norris, {Shane A.}",
note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank all those who participated in this study; their sincerity in sharing their perceptions on SSB and their views on the SSB tax were fundamental to the success of this study. Financial support: The International Development Research Center (IDRC) (grant number D1612160-01) provided financial support for the project. IDRC did not have any role in the analysis, interpretation or writing of this manuscript, or the decision to publish. Conflict of interest: The authors declare there is no conflict of interest. Authorship: E.N.B. collected data, analysed data and wrote the manuscript; N.S. conceptualised the paper and commented on the manuscript; G.M. collected data and commented on the manuscript; A.T., K.H. and S.A.N. conceptualised the paper and commented on the manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Human and Ethics Research Committee (HREC) of University of the Witwatersrand (M170680). Written informed consent was obtained from the study participants after reading out the content of the information sheet and explaining the purpose of the study. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors.",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980019001356",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "374--383",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",
}