Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer

Petra De Sutter, Ilse Delbaere, Jan Gerris, Hans Verstraelen, Sylvie Goetgeluk, Josiane Van der Elst, Marleen Temmerman, Marc Dhont

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Backgound: Single-embryo transfer (SET) has proven efficient in reducing multiple pregnancy rates after assisted reproduction technologies (ART). This study compares outcome of singletons after SET and double-embryo transfer (DET). Methods: We studied 404 SET and 431 DET patients, who delivered a singleton child of >500 g after fresh embryo transfer in a first, second or third cycle. Preterm birth and low birthweight incidences and gestational age and birthweight were compared between both groups. Adjustments were made for maternal age, parity, cycle rank number, treatment indication, ART method, embryo characteristics and sex of the child. Results: Singletons born after DET have a significantly lower birthweight than that after SET (3204.3 ± 617.5 g versus 3324.6 ± 509.7 g, P < 0.01). Also preterm birth (<37 weeks) [odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.94] and low birthweight (<2500 g) (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.86-6.12) are significantly more common in DET singletons. Conclusions: Singleton birth after SET is advantageous compared with DET. This sheds new light on the reasons why singleton births following ART do worse than spontaneously conceived singletons in IVF programs, where double- or multiple-embryo transfer is standard.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2633-2637
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume21
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Assisted reproduction
  • Pregnancy outcome
  • Single-embryo transfer
  • Singleton

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this