TY - JOUR
T1 - Brain Tumor Programs in Asia and Africa
T2 - Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
AU - Kedia, Shweta
AU - Banson, Mabel
AU - Cheserem, Beverly
AU - Chaurasia, Bipin
AU - Karekezi, Claire
AU - Uche, Enoch
AU - Apuahe, Esther
AU - Balogun, James A.
AU - Lucena, Lynne Lourdes N.
AU - Mbaye, Maguette
AU - Opara, Oluwamayowa
AU - Mahmoud, M. Eisam Elhaj
AU - Singh, Priya
AU - Chemate, Sachin
AU - Bora, Santanu Kumar
AU - Oswari, Selfy
AU - Totimeh, Teddy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Objective: To assess the status of brain tumor programs in Asia and Africa and propose comprehensive evidence-based short- and long-term measures for improving the existing systems. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in June 2022 by the Asia-Africa Neurosurgery Collaborative. A 27-item questionnaire was designed and distributed to gain insight into the status and future directions of brain tumor programs in Asia and Africa. Six components of brain tumor programs were identified—surgery, oncology, neuropathology, research, training, and finances—and assigned scores of 0–14. The total scores allowed subclassification of each country into levels of brain tumor program from I to VI. Results: A total of 110 responses from 92 countries were received. These were subdivided into 3 groups: group 1, countries with response from neurosurgeons (73 countries); group 2, countries with no neurosurgeons (19 countries); and group 3, countries without a neurosurgeon response (16 countries). The components associated with the highest level of brain tumor program were surgery, neuropathology, and oncology. Most countries in both continents had level III brain tumor programs with a mean surgical score of 2.24. The major lag between each group was with respect to the advances in neuropathology and financial support. Conclusions: There is an urgent need to improve and develop existing and nonexistent neuro-oncology infrastructure, personnel, and logistics in countries across the continents, especially for the countries with no neurosurgeons.
AB - Objective: To assess the status of brain tumor programs in Asia and Africa and propose comprehensive evidence-based short- and long-term measures for improving the existing systems. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in June 2022 by the Asia-Africa Neurosurgery Collaborative. A 27-item questionnaire was designed and distributed to gain insight into the status and future directions of brain tumor programs in Asia and Africa. Six components of brain tumor programs were identified—surgery, oncology, neuropathology, research, training, and finances—and assigned scores of 0–14. The total scores allowed subclassification of each country into levels of brain tumor program from I to VI. Results: A total of 110 responses from 92 countries were received. These were subdivided into 3 groups: group 1, countries with response from neurosurgeons (73 countries); group 2, countries with no neurosurgeons (19 countries); and group 3, countries without a neurosurgeon response (16 countries). The components associated with the highest level of brain tumor program were surgery, neuropathology, and oncology. Most countries in both continents had level III brain tumor programs with a mean surgical score of 2.24. The major lag between each group was with respect to the advances in neuropathology and financial support. Conclusions: There is an urgent need to improve and develop existing and nonexistent neuro-oncology infrastructure, personnel, and logistics in countries across the continents, especially for the countries with no neurosurgeons.
KW - ASAFRIN
KW - Asia-Africa
KW - Brain tumor program
KW - Neuro-oncology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160715236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.067
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.067
M3 - Article
C2 - 37120142
AN - SCOPUS:85160715236
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 175
SP - e1041-e1048
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -