TY - JOUR
T1 - Can contracted out health facilities improve access, equity, and quality of maternal and newborn health services? Evidence from Pakistan
AU - Zaidi, Shehla
AU - Riaz, Atif
AU - Rabbani, Fauziah
AU - Azam, Syed Iqbal
AU - Imran, Syeda Nida
AU - Pradhan, Nouhseen Akber
AU - Khan, Gul Nawaz
N1 - Funding Information:
Publication costs for this article were funded by the British Council. This article has been published as part of Health Research Policy and Systems Volume 13 Supplement 1, 2015: Maternal and Newborn Health Research and Advocacy Fund, Pakistan. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.health-policy-systems.com/supplements.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant (AKU-1/2012/27) from the Department of International Development (DFID), United Kingdom, and the Australian Aid Agency (AusAID) through the Research and Advocacy Fund of the British Council, Pakistan. The findings and conclusions in this research are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of DFID, AusAID, or the Maternal and Newborn Health Programme Research and Advocacy Fund (RAF). The authors are grateful to Egbert Sonderp at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine for peer reviewing the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Zaidi et al.
PY - 2015/11/25
Y1 - 2015/11/25
N2 - Background: The case of contracting out government health services to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) has been weak for maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) services, with documented gains being mainly in curative services. We present an in-depth assessment of the comparative advantages of contracting out on MNCH access, quality, and equity, using a case study from Pakistan. Methods: An end-line, cross-sectional assessment was conducted of government facilities contracted out to a large national NGO and government-managed centres serving as controls, in two remote rural districts of Pakistan. Contracting out was specific for augmenting MNCH services but without contractual performance incentives. A household survey, a health facility survey, and focus group discussions with client and spouses were used for assessment. Results: Contracted out facilities had a significantly higher utilization as compared to control facilities for antenatal care, delivery, postnatal care, emergency obstetric care, and neonatal illness. Contracted facilities had comparatively better quality of MNCH services but not in all aspects. Better household practices were also seen in the district where contracting involved administrative control over outreach programs. Contracting was also faced with certain drawbacks. Facility utilization was inequitably higher amongst more educated and affluent clients. Contracted out catchments had higher out-of-pocket expenses on MNCH services, driven by steeper transport costs and user charges for additional diagnostics. Contracting out did not influence higher MNCH service coverage rates across the catchment. Physical distances, inadequate transport, and low demand for facility-based care in non-emergency settings were key client-reported barriers. Conclusion: Contracting out MNCH services at government health facilities can improve facility utilization and bring some improvement in quality of services. However, contracting out of health facilities is insufficient to increase service access across the catchment in remote rural contexts and requires accompanying measures for demand enhancement, transportation access, and targeting of the more disadvantaged clientele.
AB - Background: The case of contracting out government health services to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) has been weak for maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) services, with documented gains being mainly in curative services. We present an in-depth assessment of the comparative advantages of contracting out on MNCH access, quality, and equity, using a case study from Pakistan. Methods: An end-line, cross-sectional assessment was conducted of government facilities contracted out to a large national NGO and government-managed centres serving as controls, in two remote rural districts of Pakistan. Contracting out was specific for augmenting MNCH services but without contractual performance incentives. A household survey, a health facility survey, and focus group discussions with client and spouses were used for assessment. Results: Contracted out facilities had a significantly higher utilization as compared to control facilities for antenatal care, delivery, postnatal care, emergency obstetric care, and neonatal illness. Contracted facilities had comparatively better quality of MNCH services but not in all aspects. Better household practices were also seen in the district where contracting involved administrative control over outreach programs. Contracting was also faced with certain drawbacks. Facility utilization was inequitably higher amongst more educated and affluent clients. Contracted out catchments had higher out-of-pocket expenses on MNCH services, driven by steeper transport costs and user charges for additional diagnostics. Contracting out did not influence higher MNCH service coverage rates across the catchment. Physical distances, inadequate transport, and low demand for facility-based care in non-emergency settings were key client-reported barriers. Conclusion: Contracting out MNCH services at government health facilities can improve facility utilization and bring some improvement in quality of services. However, contracting out of health facilities is insufficient to increase service access across the catchment in remote rural contexts and requires accompanying measures for demand enhancement, transportation access, and targeting of the more disadvantaged clientele.
KW - Contracting out
KW - Maternal and newborn health
KW - Public health facilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959120025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12961-015-0041-8
DO - 10.1186/s12961-015-0041-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 26792666
AN - SCOPUS:84959120025
SN - 1478-4505
VL - 13
JO - Health Research Policy and Systems
JF - Health Research Policy and Systems
IS - 1
M1 - 54
ER -