Cefixime: An oral option for the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever in children

Iqbal Ahmad Memon, Abdul Gaffar Billoo, Hamida Iqbal Memon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Enteric fever is a serious public health problem in Pakistan, where multidrug-resistant salmonellosis causes enteric fever with increased morbidity and mortality. Costly parenteral therapy and lack of an established safety profile for the use of quinolones in children necessitate evaluation of an oral treatment option. This study is meant to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of an oral third-generation cephalosporin (cefixime) in the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever. Methods. Between November 1993 and October 1994, 85 patients, 15 years of age or less, with culture-proven enteric fever were randomly assigned tO two groups. Group A (n = 41) received cefixime at a dosage of 10 mg/kg to 12 mg/kg per day in two divided doses. Group B (n = 44) received chloramphenicol at a dosage of 100 mg/kg daily in four divided doses. Both groups were treated for 2 weeks. Results. In group A, 95% (39/41) of the patients receiving cefixime responded favorably, whereas in group B, 30% (14/45) responded to chloramphenicol. The 31 patients not cured in group B were then successfully treated with cefixime. Overall, cefixime was well tolerated. Subsequent antibiogram data showed an overall multidrug-resistance rate of 78% (66/85). Conclusions. Cefixime is a safe, effective; and cheaper oral option for the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever. Further studies are needed, however, to validate this observation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1204-1207
Number of pages4
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume90
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cefixime: An oral option for the treatment of multidrug-resistant enteric fever in children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this