TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges in implementing 2021 WHO CNS tumor classification in a resource-limited setting
AU - Gilani, Ahmed
AU - Altaf, Ahmed
AU - Shakir, Muhammad
AU - Minhas, Khurram
AU - Enam, Syed Ather
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - Background The 2021 World Health Organization classification of Central Nervous System tumors (CNS5) includes molecular biomarkers in the necessary diagnostic criteria for many tumors. Identifying these markers often requires next-generation sequencing (NGS) and/or DNA methylation profiling, presenting challenges in diagnosing these tumors in low or middle-income countries (LMICs) and other resource-limited settings. Here, we will illustrate the real-world scope of the problem by presenting a neuropathologist's experience with implementing the CNS5 criteria in an academic medical center in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods CNS tumor biopsies received by a single neuropathologist (AG) in Karachi during a 6-month period (October 2022 to March 2023) were included in the study. Routine histologic processing, H&E and immunohistochemistry were performed. Results A total of 443 tumor cases were received, 87 of those (19.64% of total, 36.86% of glial, embryonal, and glioneuronal tumors) could not be assigned a CNS5 diagnosis. Top reasons for failure to reach a CNS5 diagnosis were low-grade gliomas or infiltrative glioma in pediatric/ adolescent young adults not further classifiable on histology, IDH-mutant tumors requiring 1p/19q testing to rule out oligodendroglioma, undifferentiated tumors with unclear lineage and adult grade 2 or 3 IDH-wildtype astrocytomas suspicious for glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Send-out DNA methylation testing in 22 cases resolved the diagnostic questions in all except one case. Conclusions Without access to molecular testing, up to a third of all glial, embryonal, and glioneuronal tumors could not be assigned a CNS5 diagnosis, leading to diagnostic ambiguity and therapeutic confusion. Until affordable molecular assays are available, CNS5 diagnostic criteria have limited applicability in resource-limited settings.
AB - Background The 2021 World Health Organization classification of Central Nervous System tumors (CNS5) includes molecular biomarkers in the necessary diagnostic criteria for many tumors. Identifying these markers often requires next-generation sequencing (NGS) and/or DNA methylation profiling, presenting challenges in diagnosing these tumors in low or middle-income countries (LMICs) and other resource-limited settings. Here, we will illustrate the real-world scope of the problem by presenting a neuropathologist's experience with implementing the CNS5 criteria in an academic medical center in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods CNS tumor biopsies received by a single neuropathologist (AG) in Karachi during a 6-month period (October 2022 to March 2023) were included in the study. Routine histologic processing, H&E and immunohistochemistry were performed. Results A total of 443 tumor cases were received, 87 of those (19.64% of total, 36.86% of glial, embryonal, and glioneuronal tumors) could not be assigned a CNS5 diagnosis. Top reasons for failure to reach a CNS5 diagnosis were low-grade gliomas or infiltrative glioma in pediatric/ adolescent young adults not further classifiable on histology, IDH-mutant tumors requiring 1p/19q testing to rule out oligodendroglioma, undifferentiated tumors with unclear lineage and adult grade 2 or 3 IDH-wildtype astrocytomas suspicious for glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Send-out DNA methylation testing in 22 cases resolved the diagnostic questions in all except one case. Conclusions Without access to molecular testing, up to a third of all glial, embryonal, and glioneuronal tumors could not be assigned a CNS5 diagnosis, leading to diagnostic ambiguity and therapeutic confusion. Until affordable molecular assays are available, CNS5 diagnostic criteria have limited applicability in resource-limited settings.
KW - DNA methylation assay
KW - LMIC
KW - Molecular diagnostics
KW - neuropathology
KW - tumor classification
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008156657
U2 - 10.1093/nop/npae124
DO - 10.1093/nop/npae124
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105008156657
SN - 2054-2577
VL - 12
SP - 401
EP - 412
JO - Neuro-Oncology Practice
JF - Neuro-Oncology Practice
IS - 3
ER -