TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma
T2 - Comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
AU - Hashmi, Atif Ali
AU - Aijaz, Saher
AU - Mahboob, Raeesa
AU - Khan, Saadia Mehmood
AU - Irfan, Muhammad
AU - Iftikhar, Narisa
AU - Nisar, Mariam
AU - Siddiqui, Maham
AU - Edhi, Muhammad Muzzammil
AU - Faridi, Naveen
AU - Khan, Amir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/7/31
Y1 - 2018/7/31
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma in our population and also to compare the clinico-pathologic features of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma with invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IDC, NOS). Results: 86.9% of the cases were identified as ductal carcinoma, NOS, while 2.2% were metaplastic and 0.76% cases were micropapillary carcinoma. Metaplastic carcinomas were found to be of higher grade as compared to IDC, NOS as 81% of metaplastic carcinoma were grade III compared to 35% IDC, NOS. 79% of metaplastic carcinoma were ER negative and 86% were PR negative, respectively as compared to ductal carcinoma NOS, which were 40% ER negative and 54% were PR. Similarly, 86.7% micropapillary cancers were ER positive and 73.3% were PR positive. Moreover, 66.7% micropapillary carcinoma showed nodal metastasis and 77.8% showed lymphovascular invasion, which was significantly higher than that of IDC, NOS micropapillary and metaplastic carcinomas accounts for less than 2 and 1% of the breast cancer burden in our population and highly correlates with poor prognosis parameters therefore, require more intensive management in our population.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma in our population and also to compare the clinico-pathologic features of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma with invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IDC, NOS). Results: 86.9% of the cases were identified as ductal carcinoma, NOS, while 2.2% were metaplastic and 0.76% cases were micropapillary carcinoma. Metaplastic carcinomas were found to be of higher grade as compared to IDC, NOS as 81% of metaplastic carcinoma were grade III compared to 35% IDC, NOS. 79% of metaplastic carcinoma were ER negative and 86% were PR negative, respectively as compared to ductal carcinoma NOS, which were 40% ER negative and 54% were PR. Similarly, 86.7% micropapillary cancers were ER positive and 73.3% were PR positive. Moreover, 66.7% micropapillary carcinoma showed nodal metastasis and 77.8% showed lymphovascular invasion, which was significantly higher than that of IDC, NOS micropapillary and metaplastic carcinomas accounts for less than 2 and 1% of the breast cancer burden in our population and highly correlates with poor prognosis parameters therefore, require more intensive management in our population.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - ER
KW - Her2neu
KW - Metaplastic carcinoma
KW - Micropapillary carcinoma
KW - PR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051170866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13104-018-3623-z
DO - 10.1186/s13104-018-3623-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 30064485
AN - SCOPUS:85051170866
SN - 1756-0500
VL - 11
JO - BMC Research Notes
JF - BMC Research Notes
IS - 1
M1 - 531
ER -