Controversies about radioactive iodine-131 remnant ablation in low risk thyroid cancers: Are we near a consensus?

Maseeh Uz Zaman, Nosheen Fatima, Ajit Kumar Padhy, Unaiza Zaman

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Well differentiated thyroid cancers (WDTC), including papillary (80%) and follicular (10%) types, are the most common endocrine cancers globally. Over the last few decades most the diagnosed cases have fallen into low risk categories. Radioactive iodine-131 (RAI) has an established role in reducing recurrence and improving the survival in high risk patients. In patients with primary tumor size <1 cm, RAI is not recommended by many thyroid societies. However, low risk WDTC has been an arena of major controversies, most importantly the role and dose of adjuvant RAI for remnant ablation to minimize chances of recurrence and improving survival. This review is an attempt to update readers about the previous and existing practice based on results of nonrandomized trials and evolving trends fueled by recently published randomized studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6209-6213
Number of pages5
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Follicular thyroid cancer
  • Low dose iodine
  • Papillary thyroid cancer
  • Remnant ablation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controversies about radioactive iodine-131 remnant ablation in low risk thyroid cancers: Are we near a consensus?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this