@article{ff03829071f54ae0a03b82f57cc537ff,
title = "Cost-effectiveness analysis of implementing an integrated neonatal care kit to reduce neonatal infection in rural Pakistan",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of distribution of the integrated neonatal care kit (iNCK) by community health workers from the healthcare payer perspective in Rahimyar Khan, Pakistan. Setting Rahimyar Khan, Pakistan. Participants N/A. Intervention Cost-utility analysis using a Markov model based on cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT: NCT 02130856) data and a literature review. We compared distribution of the iNCK to pregnant mothers to local standard of care and followed infants over a lifetime horizon. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was incremental net monetary benefit (INMB, at a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$15.50), discounted at 3%. Secondary outcomes were life years, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and costs. Results At a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$15.50, distribution of the iNCK resulted in lower expected DALYs (28.7 vs 29.6 years) at lower expected cost (US$52.50 vs 55.20), translating to an INMB of US$10.22 per iNCK distributed. These results were sensitive to the baseline risk of infection, cost of the iNCK and the estimated effect of the iNCK on the relative risk of infection. At relative risks of infection below 0.79 and iNCK costs below US$25.90, the iNCK remained cost-effective compared with current local standard of care. Conclusion The distribution of the iNCK dominated the current local standard of care (ie, the iNCK is less costly and more effective than current care standards). Most of the cost-effectiveness of the iNCK was attributable to a reduction in neonatal infection.",
keywords = "community child health, health economics, neonatology",
author = "Fiona Muttalib and Karen Chung and Pell, {Lisa Grace} and Shabina Ariff and Sajid Soofi and Morris, {Shaun K.} and Beate Sander",
note = "Funding Information: 3Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 4Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan 5Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan 6Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 7Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 8Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Twitter Sajid Soofi @sajidsoofi Contributors FM, KC, LGP, SKM and BS conceptualised the study. FM and KC conducted the literature review, developed the cost-effectiveness model, conducted analyses and drafted and revised the manuscript. LGP, SA, SKM and SS provided access to the integrated neonatal care kit randomised controlled trial data. SA, SKM, LGP, BS and SS provided critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript for submission (FM, KC, LGP, SA, SS, SKM and BS) and accept full responsibility for the work and conduct of the study as guarantors. Funding BS receives research funding from a Canada Research Chair in Economics of Infectious Diseases (CRC-950-232429). FM received funding from the Hospital for Sick Children Global Child Health Fellowship during the completion of this study. KC received salary support from the Canada Graduate Scholarship— Master{\textquoteright}s funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047793",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",
}