TY - JOUR
T1 - CT features with histopathological correlation in inflammatory versus benign & malignant neoplastic appendiceal mucoceles
T2 - a retrospective cross-sectional study
AU - Khandwala, Kumail
AU - Sajjad, Nida
AU - Khan, Dawar Burhan
AU - Malik, Amyn A.
AU - Memon, Wasim Ahmed
AU - Rao, Muhammad Owais
AU - Ud Din, Nasir
AU - Khan, Faheemullah
AU - Ahmed, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background & objectives: Differentiation of histologic subtypes of appendiceal mucoceles may prove to be difficult on computed tomography (CT). The main objective of this study was to identify the CT features of mucocele of the appendix and correlate the imaging findings with histopathology in inflammatory, benign, and malignant neoplastic lesions, and whether these entities can be accurately differentiated on CT imaging. Materials and methods: CT scans of 31 patients with diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele were retrospectively reviewed and compared with histopathology. The appendix was evaluated for maximal luminal diameter, cystic dilatation, luminal attenuation, appendicolith, mural calcification and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding and fluid. CT findings were compared by use of Mann-Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic utility of appendiceal luminal diameter in differentiating different types of mucoceles. Results: Patients were classified into three groups: those with inflammatory mucoceles (n = 10), benign mucoceles (simple mucocele, mucosal hyperplasia and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 17), and those with malignant mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 4). The mean diameter was found to be significantly different in the three groups with the largest diameter in the benign subgroup. Soft tissue thickening (p-value 0.01), mural calcification (p-value < 0.01), internal septation (p-value 0.02) and fat stranding (p-value 0.05) was found to be of statistical significance among the various groups. The best cut-off diameter for diagnosis of inflammatory mucoceles to be ≤ 2.3 cm with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 90%. Conclusion: Our study suggests that CT findings such as appendiceal diameter less than 2.3 cm, absence of soft tissue thickening, mural calcification and internal septation may be useful in preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory appendiceal mucocele.
AB - Background & objectives: Differentiation of histologic subtypes of appendiceal mucoceles may prove to be difficult on computed tomography (CT). The main objective of this study was to identify the CT features of mucocele of the appendix and correlate the imaging findings with histopathology in inflammatory, benign, and malignant neoplastic lesions, and whether these entities can be accurately differentiated on CT imaging. Materials and methods: CT scans of 31 patients with diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele were retrospectively reviewed and compared with histopathology. The appendix was evaluated for maximal luminal diameter, cystic dilatation, luminal attenuation, appendicolith, mural calcification and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding and fluid. CT findings were compared by use of Mann-Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic utility of appendiceal luminal diameter in differentiating different types of mucoceles. Results: Patients were classified into three groups: those with inflammatory mucoceles (n = 10), benign mucoceles (simple mucocele, mucosal hyperplasia and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 17), and those with malignant mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 4). The mean diameter was found to be significantly different in the three groups with the largest diameter in the benign subgroup. Soft tissue thickening (p-value 0.01), mural calcification (p-value < 0.01), internal septation (p-value 0.02) and fat stranding (p-value 0.05) was found to be of statistical significance among the various groups. The best cut-off diameter for diagnosis of inflammatory mucoceles to be ≤ 2.3 cm with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 90%. Conclusion: Our study suggests that CT findings such as appendiceal diameter less than 2.3 cm, absence of soft tissue thickening, mural calcification and internal septation may be useful in preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory appendiceal mucocele.
KW - Appendix
KW - Benign
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Malignant
KW - Mucinous neoplasm
KW - Mucocele
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217273931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12876-025-03630-7
DO - 10.1186/s12876-025-03630-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 39875838
AN - SCOPUS:85217273931
SN - 1471-230X
VL - 25
JO - BMC Gastroenterology
JF - BMC Gastroenterology
IS - 1
M1 - 40
ER -