TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining quality indicators for emergency care delivery
T2 - Findings of an expert consensus process by emergency care practitioners in Africa
AU - AFEM Scientific Committee
AU - Broccoli, Morgan C.
AU - Moresky, Rachel
AU - Dixon, Julia
AU - Muya, Ivy
AU - Taubman, Cara
AU - Wallis, Lee A.
AU - Calvello Hynes, Emilie J.
AU - Abuagla, Qais
AU - Azaz, Akliilu
AU - Becker, Joe
AU - Bizanso, Mark
AU - Brewer, Tom
AU - Brysiewicz, Petra
AU - Cameron, Peter
AU - Castren, Maaret
AU - Cattermole, Giles
AU - Chang, Cindy
AU - Corder, Robert
AU - Cox, Megan
AU - De Vries, Shaheem
AU - DeVos, Elizabeth
AU - Diango, Ken
AU - Dunlop, Steve
AU - Fraser Doh, Kiesha
AU - Fruhan, Scott
AU - Geduld, Heike
AU - George, Upendo
AU - Hangula, Rachel
AU - Hankin-Wei, Abigail
AU - Hardcastle, Timothy
AU - Harrison, Hooi Ling
AU - Helmy, Sanna
AU - Hollong, Bonaventure
AU - Jaiganesh, Thiagarajan
AU - Kalanzi, Joseph
AU - Krym, Valerie
AU - Lin, Janet
AU - Loganathan, Deb
AU - Mabula, Peter
AU - Mbanjumucyo, Gabin
AU - Mfinanga, Juma
AU - Mould-Millman, Nee Kofi
AU - Mukuddem, Nurenesa
AU - Muldoon, Lily
AU - Muller, Mudenga Mutendi
AU - Murray, Brittany
AU - Norgang, Kathryn
AU - Nwauwa, Nnamdi
AU - Nyrienda, Mulinda
AU - Wachira, Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Facility-based emergency care delivery in low-income and middle- income countries is expanding rapidly, particularly in Africa. Unfortunately, these efforts rarely include measurement of the quality or the impact of care provided, which is essential for improvement of care provision. Our aim was to determine context-appropriate quality indicators that will allow uniform and objective data collection to enhance emergency care delivery throughout Africa. We undertook a multiphase expert consensus process to identify, rank and refine quality indicators. A comprehensive review of the literature identified existing indicators; those associated with a substantial burden of disease in Africa were categorised and presented to consensus conference delegates. Participants selected indicators based on inclusion criteria and priority clinical conditions. The indicators were then presented to a group of expert clinicians via on-line survey; all meeting agreements were refined in-person by a separate panel and ranked according to validity, feasibility and value. The consensus working group selected seven conditions addressing nearly 75% of mortality in the African region to prioritise during indicator development, and the final product at the end of the multiphase study was a list of 76 indicators. This comprehensive process produced a robust set of quality indicators for emergency care that are appropriate for use in the African setting. The adaptation of a standardised set of indicators will enhance the quality of care provided and allow for comparison of system strengthening efforts and resource distribution.
AB - Facility-based emergency care delivery in low-income and middle- income countries is expanding rapidly, particularly in Africa. Unfortunately, these efforts rarely include measurement of the quality or the impact of care provided, which is essential for improvement of care provision. Our aim was to determine context-appropriate quality indicators that will allow uniform and objective data collection to enhance emergency care delivery throughout Africa. We undertook a multiphase expert consensus process to identify, rank and refine quality indicators. A comprehensive review of the literature identified existing indicators; those associated with a substantial burden of disease in Africa were categorised and presented to consensus conference delegates. Participants selected indicators based on inclusion criteria and priority clinical conditions. The indicators were then presented to a group of expert clinicians via on-line survey; all meeting agreements were refined in-person by a separate panel and ranked according to validity, feasibility and value. The consensus working group selected seven conditions addressing nearly 75% of mortality in the African region to prioritise during indicator development, and the final product at the end of the multiphase study was a list of 76 indicators. This comprehensive process produced a robust set of quality indicators for emergency care that are appropriate for use in the African setting. The adaptation of a standardised set of indicators will enhance the quality of care provided and allow for comparison of system strengthening efforts and resource distribution.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85050456290
U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000479
DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000479
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050456290
SN - 2059-7908
VL - 3
JO - BMJ Global Health
JF - BMJ Global Health
IS - 1
M1 - e000479
ER -