TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of cervical spine trauma
T2 - Are 3-dimensional reconstructed images as accurate as multiplanar computer tomography?
AU - Shakil, Asad
AU - Muneeb, Aeman
AU - Khan, Muhammad Salman
AU - Sohail, Amir Humza
AU - Ismail, Sameeha
AU - Maan, Muhammad Hassaan Arif
AU - Hakmi, Hazim
AU - Sajan, Abin
AU - Bari, Vaqar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Introduction: This study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) in detection of cervical spine injuries in symptomatic post-trauma patients using multiplanar computed tomography (MP-CT) as reference standard. Approach: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Aga Khan University from July 2016 to January 2017. Patients were included using a non-probability, consecutive sampling. MP-CT and 3D- CT images were obtained and evaluated by a senior radiologist to identify cervical spine injuries. Results: 205 patients were included in the study. For fractures, 3D-CT images had sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.8% and diagnostic accuracy of 97%. For dislocations, 3D-CT reported sensitivity of 83.34%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 99.5% and diagnostic accuracy of 99.5%. Conclusion: 3D-CT has good diagnostic accuracy for injuries of the cervical spine but must be reviewed simultaneously with multiplanar CT images.
AB - Introduction: This study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) in detection of cervical spine injuries in symptomatic post-trauma patients using multiplanar computed tomography (MP-CT) as reference standard. Approach: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Aga Khan University from July 2016 to January 2017. Patients were included using a non-probability, consecutive sampling. MP-CT and 3D- CT images were obtained and evaluated by a senior radiologist to identify cervical spine injuries. Results: 205 patients were included in the study. For fractures, 3D-CT images had sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.8% and diagnostic accuracy of 97%. For dislocations, 3D-CT reported sensitivity of 83.34%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 99.5% and diagnostic accuracy of 99.5%. Conclusion: 3D-CT has good diagnostic accuracy for injuries of the cervical spine but must be reviewed simultaneously with multiplanar CT images.
KW - Cervical spine fracture
KW - Cervical spine trauma
KW - Dislocation
KW - Surface rendering
KW - Three dimensional reconstruction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85106236764
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.04.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 34001456
AN - SCOPUS:85106236764
SN - 1939-8654
VL - 52
SP - 385
EP - 389
JO - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
JF - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
IS - 3
ER -