Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development and Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Dental Residents’ Understanding and Satisfaction with Their Postgraduate Exit Summative Assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Students’ comprehension of the assessment process is critical for effective evaluation. The authors at the Aga Khan University Hospital developed a questionnaire to assess Pakistan’s dental postgraduate residents' understanding and satisfaction with the summative assessment system conducted by the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. Following ethical approval, six senior dental faculty and one medical educationist reviewed and validated the 37-item tool across seven domains from September to November 2023. The scale-level content validity index for relevance and clarity was 0.97, with a modified Kappa statistic of ≥0.85. All items received item-level content validity index ≥0.86 except one regarding “examiner calibration” (0.71) which was retained based on literature support. Internal reliability testing with 15 participants yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.7. This reliable and validated tool can be used to evaluate learners’ perceptions and satisfaction with assessment procedures and is applicable across postgraduate dental education specialities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1629-1632
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP
Volume35
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Assessment system
  • Competency-based learning
  • Content validity
  • Curriculum alignment
  • Dental education
  • Dental residents
  • Internal reliability
  • Postgraduate education
  • Summative assessment
  • Tool validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Dental Residents’ Understanding and Satisfaction with Their Postgraduate Exit Summative Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this