Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid: An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity

Revathi Rajagopal, Rosdali Diaz Coronado, Syed Ahmer Hamid, Regina Navarro Martin del Campo, Frederick Boop, Asim Bag, Alma Edith Benito Reséndiz, K. Vasudeva Bhat, Danny Campos, Kenneth Chang, Ramona Cirt, Ludi Dhyani Rahmartani, Jen Chun Foo, Julieta Hoveyan, John T. Lucas, Thandeka Ngcana, Rahat Ul Ain, Nuha Omran, Diana S. Osorio, Bilal Mazhar QureshiNoah D. Sabin, Ernestina Schandorf, Patrick Bankah, Mary Ann Dadzie, Hafisatu Gbadamos, Hend Sharafeldin, Mahendra Somathilaka, Peiyi Yang, Yao Atteby Jean-Jacques, Anan Zhang, Zeena Salman, Miriam Gonzalez, Paola Friedrich, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Daniel C. Moreira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. To enhance the quality of care available for children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors across the world, a systematic evaluation of capacity is needed to identify gaps and prioritize interventions.To that end, we created the pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) resource assessment aid (PANORAMA) tool. Methods. The development of PANORAMA encompassed 3 phases: operationalization, consensus building, and piloting. PANORAMA aimed to capture the elements of the PNO care continuum through domains with weighted assessments reflecting their importance. Responses were ordinally scored to reflect the level of satisfaction. PANORAMA was revised based on feedback at various phases to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity. Results. The operationalization phase identified 14 domains by using 252 questions.The consensus phase involved 15 experts (6 pediatric oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 neurosurgeons, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists). The consensus phase validated the identified domains, questions, and scoring methodology.The PANORAMA domains included national context, hospital infrastructure, organization and service integration, human resources, financing, laboratory, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive care, and patient outcomes. PANORAMA was piloted at 13 institutions in 12 countries, representing diverse patient care contexts. Face validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the estimated score by respondents and calculated PANORAMA scores for each domain (r = 0.67, P < .0001). Conclusions. PANORAMA was developed through a systematic, collaborative approach, ensuring its relevance to evaluate core elements of PNO service capacity. Distribution of PANORAMA will enable quantitative service evaluations across institutions, facilitating benchmarking and the prioritization of interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbervdae171
JournalNeuro-Oncology Advances
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • capacity building
  • global oncology
  • pediatric neuro-oncology
  • service capacity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid: An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this