TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid
T2 - An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity
AU - Rajagopal, Revathi
AU - Coronado, Rosdali Diaz
AU - Hamid, Syed Ahmer
AU - Martin del Campo, Regina Navarro
AU - Boop, Frederick
AU - Bag, Asim
AU - Reséndiz, Alma Edith Benito
AU - Vasudeva Bhat, K.
AU - Campos, Danny
AU - Chang, Kenneth
AU - Cirt, Ramona
AU - Rahmartani, Ludi Dhyani
AU - Foo, Jen Chun
AU - Hoveyan, Julieta
AU - Lucas, John T.
AU - Ngcana, Thandeka
AU - Ul Ain, Rahat
AU - Omran, Nuha
AU - Osorio, Diana S.
AU - Qureshi, Bilal Mazhar
AU - Sabin, Noah D.
AU - Schandorf, Ernestina
AU - Bankah, Patrick
AU - Dadzie, Mary Ann
AU - Gbadamos, Hafisatu
AU - Sharafeldin, Hend
AU - Somathilaka, Mahendra
AU - Yang, Peiyi
AU - Jean-Jacques, Yao Atteby
AU - Zhang, Anan
AU - Salman, Zeena
AU - Gonzalez, Miriam
AU - Friedrich, Paola
AU - Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos
AU - Qaddoumi, Ibrahim
AU - Moreira, Daniel C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Background. To enhance the quality of care available for children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors across the world, a systematic evaluation of capacity is needed to identify gaps and prioritize interventions.To that end, we created the pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) resource assessment aid (PANORAMA) tool. Methods. The development of PANORAMA encompassed 3 phases: operationalization, consensus building, and piloting. PANORAMA aimed to capture the elements of the PNO care continuum through domains with weighted assessments reflecting their importance. Responses were ordinally scored to reflect the level of satisfaction. PANORAMA was revised based on feedback at various phases to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity. Results. The operationalization phase identified 14 domains by using 252 questions.The consensus phase involved 15 experts (6 pediatric oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 neurosurgeons, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists). The consensus phase validated the identified domains, questions, and scoring methodology.The PANORAMA domains included national context, hospital infrastructure, organization and service integration, human resources, financing, laboratory, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive care, and patient outcomes. PANORAMA was piloted at 13 institutions in 12 countries, representing diverse patient care contexts. Face validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the estimated score by respondents and calculated PANORAMA scores for each domain (r = 0.67, P < .0001). Conclusions. PANORAMA was developed through a systematic, collaborative approach, ensuring its relevance to evaluate core elements of PNO service capacity. Distribution of PANORAMA will enable quantitative service evaluations across institutions, facilitating benchmarking and the prioritization of interventions.
AB - Background. To enhance the quality of care available for children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors across the world, a systematic evaluation of capacity is needed to identify gaps and prioritize interventions.To that end, we created the pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) resource assessment aid (PANORAMA) tool. Methods. The development of PANORAMA encompassed 3 phases: operationalization, consensus building, and piloting. PANORAMA aimed to capture the elements of the PNO care continuum through domains with weighted assessments reflecting their importance. Responses were ordinally scored to reflect the level of satisfaction. PANORAMA was revised based on feedback at various phases to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity. Results. The operationalization phase identified 14 domains by using 252 questions.The consensus phase involved 15 experts (6 pediatric oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 neurosurgeons, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists). The consensus phase validated the identified domains, questions, and scoring methodology.The PANORAMA domains included national context, hospital infrastructure, organization and service integration, human resources, financing, laboratory, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive care, and patient outcomes. PANORAMA was piloted at 13 institutions in 12 countries, representing diverse patient care contexts. Face validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the estimated score by respondents and calculated PANORAMA scores for each domain (r = 0.67, P < .0001). Conclusions. PANORAMA was developed through a systematic, collaborative approach, ensuring its relevance to evaluate core elements of PNO service capacity. Distribution of PANORAMA will enable quantitative service evaluations across institutions, facilitating benchmarking and the prioritization of interventions.
KW - capacity building
KW - global oncology
KW - pediatric neuro-oncology
KW - service capacity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209742461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/noajnl/vdae171
DO - 10.1093/noajnl/vdae171
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85209742461
SN - 2632-2498
VL - 6
JO - Neuro-Oncology Advances
JF - Neuro-Oncology Advances
IS - 1
M1 - vdae171
ER -