TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma using an algorithmic approach - applicable in both resource-poor and resource-rich countries
AU - Naresh, Kikkeri N.
AU - Ibrahim, Hazem A.H.
AU - Lazzi, Stefano
AU - Rince, Patricia
AU - Onorati, Monica
AU - Ambrosio, Maria R.
AU - Bilhou-Nabera, Chrystèle
AU - Amen, Furrat
AU - Reid, Alistair
AU - Mawanda, Michael
AU - Calbi, Valeria
AU - Ogwang, Martin
AU - Rogena, Emily
AU - Byakika, Bessie
AU - Sayed, Shahin
AU - Moshi, Emma
AU - Mwakigonja, Amos
AU - Raphael, Martine
AU - Magrath, Ian
AU - Leoncini, Lorenzo
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Distinguishing Burkitt lymphoma (BL) from B cell lymphoma, unclassifiable with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and BL (DLBCL/BL), and DLBCL is challenging. We propose an immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) based scoring system that is employed in three phases - Phase 1 (morphology with CD10 and BCL2 immunostains), Phase 2 (CD38, CD44 and Ki-67 immunostains) and Phase 3 (FISH on paraffin sections for MYC, BCL2, BCL6 and immunoglobulin family genes). The system was evaluated on 252 aggressive B-cell lymphomas from Europe and from sub-Saharan Africa. Using the algorithm, we determined a specific diagnosis of BL or not-BL in 82%, 92% and 95% cases at Phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In 3·4% cases, the algorithm was not completely applicable due to technical reasons. Overall, this approach led to a specific diagnosis ofBL in 122 cases and to a specific diagnosis of either DLBCLor DLBCL/BL in 94% of cases that were not diagnosed as BL. We also evaluated the scoring system on 27 cases of BL confirmed on gene expression/microRNA expression profiling. Phase 1 of our scoring system led to a diagnosis of BL in 100% of these cases.
AB - Distinguishing Burkitt lymphoma (BL) from B cell lymphoma, unclassifiable with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and BL (DLBCL/BL), and DLBCL is challenging. We propose an immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) based scoring system that is employed in three phases - Phase 1 (morphology with CD10 and BCL2 immunostains), Phase 2 (CD38, CD44 and Ki-67 immunostains) and Phase 3 (FISH on paraffin sections for MYC, BCL2, BCL6 and immunoglobulin family genes). The system was evaluated on 252 aggressive B-cell lymphomas from Europe and from sub-Saharan Africa. Using the algorithm, we determined a specific diagnosis of BL or not-BL in 82%, 92% and 95% cases at Phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In 3·4% cases, the algorithm was not completely applicable due to technical reasons. Overall, this approach led to a specific diagnosis ofBL in 122 cases and to a specific diagnosis of either DLBCLor DLBCL/BL in 94% of cases that were not diagnosed as BL. We also evaluated the scoring system on 27 cases of BL confirmed on gene expression/microRNA expression profiling. Phase 1 of our scoring system led to a diagnosis of BL in 100% of these cases.
KW - Diagnostic haematology
KW - Immunophenotyping
KW - Lymphoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052266202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08771.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08771.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21718280
AN - SCOPUS:80052266202
SN - 0007-1048
VL - 154
SP - 770
EP - 776
JO - British Journal of Haematology
JF - British Journal of Haematology
IS - 6
ER -