TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic Clinical Tool in Trauma Patients to Rule out Thoracolumbar Fracture
AU - Atique, Sajid
AU - Mekkodathil, Ahammed
AU - Siddiqui, Tariq
AU - Mathradikkal, Saji
AU - Ahmed, Khalid
AU - Al-Ani, Mushreq
AU - Kanbar, Ahad
AU - Alaieb, Abubaker
AU - Hakim, Suhail
AU - Younis, Basil
AU - Ajaj, Ahmed
AU - Guerrero, Aldwin
AU - Masood, Maarij
AU - Khoschnau, Sherwan
AU - Hammo, Abdel Aziz
AU - Abdurraheim, Nuri
AU - Abdelrahman, Husham
AU - Peralta, Ruben
AU - Nabir, Syed
AU - Al-Hilli, Shatha
AU - El-Menyar, Ayman
AU - Al-Thani, Hassan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the clinical decision tool (CDT) in trauma patients, providing a comparable ability to rule out thoracolumbar (TL) fractures as traditional imaging methods. The goal is to facilitate early clearance of the TL spine without an immediate requirement for radiological tests, thereby minimizing unnecessary utilization of TL-spine imaging. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted on trauma patients with suspected TL injury. To achieve early TL clearance, the CDT assessed criteria such as absence of pain, tenderness, and pain-free axial movement and flexion. The study enrolled alert trauma patients with thoracic and/or lumbar spine injuries, defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale of 15. The study excluded patients not aligning with CDT criteria, such as those who received intravenous opioid analgesia within 4 h and those unable to stand due to suspected pelvic or lower limb injuries. Results: Following the completion of the CDT steps, there were 31 true negative cases, signifying the absence of TL fractures according to both CDT and imaging studies. The sensitivity of the CDT was 99.38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.59%-99.98%), specificity 9.1% (95% CI: 6.30%-12.73%), negative predictive value (NPV) 96.87% (95% CI: 81.02%-99.56%), positive predictive value (PPV) 34.19% (95% CI: 33.38%-35.00%), negative likelihood ratio (LHR) 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01-0.49), and positive LHR 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, negative LHR, and positive LHR varied with each step in the CDT. Notably, the overall sensitivity was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in specificity with each further step in the tool. The overall sensitivity in the study cohort (n = 500) was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in the specificity. Conclusions: The CDT to rule out TL fracture is a feasible bedside stepwise tool in fully awake trauma patients after a thorough clinical neurological examination on arrival. The tool could help Level II or III trauma centers avoid secondary triage to the higher center.
AB - Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the clinical decision tool (CDT) in trauma patients, providing a comparable ability to rule out thoracolumbar (TL) fractures as traditional imaging methods. The goal is to facilitate early clearance of the TL spine without an immediate requirement for radiological tests, thereby minimizing unnecessary utilization of TL-spine imaging. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted on trauma patients with suspected TL injury. To achieve early TL clearance, the CDT assessed criteria such as absence of pain, tenderness, and pain-free axial movement and flexion. The study enrolled alert trauma patients with thoracic and/or lumbar spine injuries, defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale of 15. The study excluded patients not aligning with CDT criteria, such as those who received intravenous opioid analgesia within 4 h and those unable to stand due to suspected pelvic or lower limb injuries. Results: Following the completion of the CDT steps, there were 31 true negative cases, signifying the absence of TL fractures according to both CDT and imaging studies. The sensitivity of the CDT was 99.38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.59%-99.98%), specificity 9.1% (95% CI: 6.30%-12.73%), negative predictive value (NPV) 96.87% (95% CI: 81.02%-99.56%), positive predictive value (PPV) 34.19% (95% CI: 33.38%-35.00%), negative likelihood ratio (LHR) 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01-0.49), and positive LHR 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, negative LHR, and positive LHR varied with each step in the CDT. Notably, the overall sensitivity was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in specificity with each further step in the tool. The overall sensitivity in the study cohort (n = 500) was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in the specificity. Conclusions: The CDT to rule out TL fracture is a feasible bedside stepwise tool in fully awake trauma patients after a thorough clinical neurological examination on arrival. The tool could help Level II or III trauma centers avoid secondary triage to the higher center.
KW - Clinical assessment
KW - emergency medicine
KW - imaging
KW - spinal injuries
KW - thoracolumbar
KW - trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206846207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jets.jets_145_23
DO - 10.4103/jets.jets_145_23
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85206846207
SN - 0974-2700
VL - 17
SP - 159
EP - 165
JO - Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock
JF - Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock
IS - 3
ER -