Do we need time adjusted mean platelet volume measurements?

Marcus D. Lancé, Rene Van Oerle, Yvonne M.C. Henskens, Marco A.E. Marcus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mean platelet volume (MPV) is associated with various diseases. Several authors reported anticoagulant and time dependency. Therefore, standardized laboratory methods are essential. The aim of this study was to standardize the MPV measurement. Blood was collected in potassium-ethylenediaminetetraacid (EDTA) and sodium-citrate tubes. First, MPV and platelet count were determined every half hour for 4 hours in 20 healthy volunteers. The same parameters were acquired from a second group of 100 healthy donors. We measured at the point of highest stability determined in the first step and aimed to determine a reference range. Citrate samples revealed significantly smaller MPV (7.0 fL ± 0.69 standard deviation [SD]) than EDTA (8.0 fL ± 0.8 SD). Platelets swell until 120 minutes in EDTA and until 60 minutes in citrate. Mean platelet count changed significantly in citrate. In the second group, no inverse correlation between MPV and platelet count was seen. A reference range was calculated (EDTA, 7.2-10.8 fL; citrate, 6.1-9.5 fL). Platelets stored in citrate are significantly smaller compared to those stored in EDTA. Timing is important when measuring platelet volume. Optimal measuring time should be 120 minutes after venipuncture. For this we depicted a reference range. Platelet count is most stable in EDTA. There was no inverse relation between MPV and platelet count.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-31
Number of pages4
JournalLaboratory Hematology
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Mean platelet volume
  • Platelet function
  • Standardization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do we need time adjusted mean platelet volume measurements?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this