Effectiveness of delivering integrated COPD care at public healthcare facilities: A cluster randomised trial in Pakistan

Muhammad Amir Khan, Nida Khan, John D. Walley, Muhammad Ahmar Khan, Joseph Hicks, Maqsood Ahmed, Faisal Imtiaz Sheikh, Muhammad Ali, Farooq Manzoor, Haroon Jehangir Khan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In Pakistan chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevalence is 2.1% in adults aged > 40 years. Despite being a health policy focus, integrated COPD care has remained neglected, with wide variation in practice. Aim: To assess whether enhanced care at public health facilities resulted in better control of COPD, treatment adherence, and smoking cessation. Design & setting: A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial was undertaken in 30 public health facilities (23 primary and 7 secondary), across three districts of Punjab, between October 2014- December 2016. Both arms had enhanced diagnosis and patient recording processes. Intervention facilities also had clinical care guides; drugs for COPD; patient education flipcharts; associated staff training; and mobile phone follow-up. Method: Facilities were randomised in a 1:1 ratio (sealed envelope independent lottery method), and 159 intervention and 154 control patients were recruited. The eligibility criteria were as follows: diagnosed with COPD, aged ≤18 years, and living in the catchment area. The primary outcome was change in BODE (Body mass index, airway Obstruction, Dyspnoea, Exercise capacity) index score from baseline to final follow-up visit. Staff and patients were not blinded. Results: Six-month primary outcomes were available for 147/159 (92.5%) intervention and 141/154 (91.6%) control participants (all clusters). The primary outcome results cluster-level analysis were as follows: mean intervention outcome = -1.67 (95% confidence intervals [CI] = -2.18 to -1.16); mean control outcome = -0.66 (95% CI = -1.09 to -0.22); and covariate-adjusted mean intervention- control difference = -0.96 (95% CI = -1.49 to -0.44; P = 0.001). Conclusion: The findings of this trial and a separate process evaluation study support the scaling of this integrated COPD care package at primary and secondary level public health facilities in Pakistan and similar settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBJGP Open
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • COPD
  • General practice
  • Integrated care package
  • Pakistan
  • Primary care
  • Public health facilities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of delivering integrated COPD care at public healthcare facilities: A cluster randomised trial in Pakistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this