Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Emergency department’s resource utilization by the neonates: experience from emergency department at a tertiary care hospital of a LMIC

  • Wasif Ilyas Vohra
  • , Muhammad Nasheet Sagri
  • , Ahmed Raheem
  • , Rida Jawed
  • , Jawad Fazal
  • , Surraiya Bano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate neonatal presentation patterns in an emergency care setting. Method: The retrospective chart review was conducted at the Emergency Department of Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, in February 2021, and comprised data of neonates presenting from January to December 2019. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. Results: There were 1,403 paediatric patients with median age at presentation 6 days (interquartile range: 3-11 days) and median weight 2.8kg (interquartile range: 2.4-3.17kg). The major complaint at presentation was yellow discolouration of skin in 659(47%) patients. Neonatal jaundice was the most common diagnosis 660(47%), followed by sepsis 338(24%). The length of stay was <4 hours for 631(45 %) of the neonates. A total of 1,138(81%) patients required intravenous cannulation, 650(46%) were managed with phototherapy and 91(7%) were ventilated. In terms of outcomes, 722(52%) neonates were admitted to step-down unit, and 314(22%) to neonatal intensive care unit, while 27(2%) died. Conclusion: Neonatal jaundice was found to be the most common diagnosis in neonates presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1098-1102
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Volume76
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Emergency treatment
  • Health resource
  • Neonates
  • Newborn

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency department’s resource utilization by the neonates: experience from emergency department at a tertiary care hospital of a LMIC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this