Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enhancing quotation accuracy assessment with Chatpdf – a game-changer for a century-old conundrum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Quotation errors compromise the reliability of published medical literature, but assessing these errors is very time-intensive. The current observational cross-sectional study was planned to assess the accuracy and speed of detecting quotation errors using the ChatPDF programme that is powered by artificial intelligence. Of the 398 quotations assessed, 310(77.9%) were fully supported, while 88(22.1%) had errors. Among the former quotations, the ChatPDF programme could comprehensively highlight 210(67.7%) PDFs, provided comprehensive answers in 262(84.5%), and was completely helpful in 248(80%) cases. In contrast, for erroneous quotations, the corresponding values were 36(40.9%), 54(61.4%) and 43(48.9%), respectively (p<0.001). ChatPDF was found to have immense potential to revolutionise quotation error assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S150-S153
JournalJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2026

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • ChatPDF
  • Natural language processing
  • Quotation error
  • Referencing error

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancing quotation accuracy assessment with Chatpdf – a game-changer for a century-old conundrum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this