Abstract
Quotation errors compromise the reliability of published medical literature, but assessing these errors is very time-intensive. The current observational cross-sectional study was planned to assess the accuracy and speed of detecting quotation errors using the ChatPDF programme that is powered by artificial intelligence. Of the 398 quotations assessed, 310(77.9%) were fully supported, while 88(22.1%) had errors. Among the former quotations, the ChatPDF programme could comprehensively highlight 210(67.7%) PDFs, provided comprehensive answers in 262(84.5%), and was completely helpful in 248(80%) cases. In contrast, for erroneous quotations, the corresponding values were 36(40.9%), 54(61.4%) and 43(48.9%), respectively (p<0.001). ChatPDF was found to have immense potential to revolutionise quotation error assessments.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | S150-S153 |
| Journal | Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 May 2026 |
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence
- ChatPDF
- Natural language processing
- Quotation error
- Referencing error
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancing quotation accuracy assessment with Chatpdf – a game-changer for a century-old conundrum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver