Female genital mutilation: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists

Els Leye, Ilse Ysebaert, Jessika Deblonde, Patricia Claeys, Gert Vermeulen, Yves Jacquemyn, Marleen Temmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices with regard to female genital mutilation (FGM) among gynaecologists in Flanders, Belgium. Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was sent to 724 Flemish gynaecologists and trainees. Results: Three-hundred-and-thirty-four questionnaires were returned. The survey revealed gaps in the knowledge of FGM and the provision of care by Flemish gynaecologists to women who had been mutilated. It also appeared that FGM was not properly addressed in the basic and specialized medical training in Flanders, that little was known about codes of conduct issued by the hospitals when these were not lacking altogether, and that knowledge about legislation concerning FGM was deficient. There was much confusion whether re-infibulation is authorized, and what its legal status is. Some respondents considered cosmetic vaginal surgery as a form of FGM and many were in favour of the medicalization of FGM. Gynaecologists were most commonly confronted with complaints related to sexual problems caused by FGM. Finally, the study also showed that only about a third of the gynaecologists were discouraging women from having their daughters excised. Conclusion: There is a need for a thorough discussion among all those concerned of the ethical and legal aspects of re-infibulation, medicalization of FGM and cosmetic vaginal surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-190
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Female Genital Mutilation
  • Flanders
  • Gynaecologists
  • Knowledge
  • Practices

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Female genital mutilation: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this