TY - JOUR
T1 - Fostering teaching-learning through workplace based assessment in postgraduate chemical pathology residency program using virtual learning environment
AU - Jafri, Lena
AU - Siddiqui, Imran
AU - Khan, Aysha Habib
AU - Tariq, Muhammed
AU - Effendi, Muhammad Umer Naeem
AU - Naseem, Azra
AU - Ahmed, Sibtain
AU - Ghani, Farooq
AU - Alidina, Shahnila
AU - Shah, Nadir
AU - Majid, Hafsa
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by Aga Khan University’s Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Grant by the Network of Teaching and Learning, AKU. The funds were utilized for faculty development, for conducting workshops and for hiring of a research associate to carry out administrative and research work. Acknowledgements Declarations
Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge Aga Khan University?s Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Grant for the financial support and guidance. We would like to acknowledge Foundation of Advancement in International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER) Philadelphia USA for their support and guidance. We would like to acknowledge Department of I.T. Academics and Computing of Aga Khan University for their assistance and guidance from initiating till completion of this project. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Snigdha Mukherjee Director of Evaluation at FAIMER Philadelphia USA for providing guidance and insight in qualitative data analysis. We have no conflict of interest and nothing to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Background: The principle of workplace based assessment (WBA) is to assess trainees at work with feedback integrated into the program simultaneously. A student driven WBA model was introduced and perception evaluation of this teaching method was done subsequently by taking feedback from the faculty as well as the postgraduate trainees (PGs) of a residency program. Methods: Descriptive multimethod study was conducted. A WBA program was designed for PGs in Chemical Pathology on Moodle and forms utilized were case-based discussion (CBD), direct observation of practical skills (DOPS) and evaluation of clinical events (ECE). Consented assessors and PGs were trained on WBA through a workshop. Pretest and posttest to assess PGs knowledge before and after WBA were conducted. Every time a WBA form was filled, perception of PGs and assessors towards WBA, time taken to conduct single WBA and feedback were recorded. Faculty and PGs qualitative feedback on perception of WBA was taken via interviews. WBA tools data and qualitative feedback were used to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the new tools. Results: Six eligible PGs and seventeen assessors participated in this study. A total of 79 CBDs (assessors n = 7 and PGs n = 6), 12 ECEs (assessors n = 6 and PGs n = 5), and 20 DOPS (assessors n = 6 and PGs n = 6) were documented. PGs average pretest score was 55.6%, which was improved to 96.4% in posttest; p value< 0.05. Scores of annual assessment before and after implementation of WBA also showed significant improvement, p value 0.039, Overall mean time taken to evaluate PG’s was 12.6 ± 9.9 min and feedback time 9.2 ± 7.4 min. Mean WBA process satisfaction of assessors and PGs on Likert scale of 1 to 10 was 8 ± 1 and 8.3 ± 0.8 respectively. Conclusion: Both assessors and fellows were satisfied with introduction and implementation of WBA. It gave the fellows opportunity to interact with assessors more often and learn from their rich experience. Gain in knowledge of PGs was identified from the statistically significant improvement in PGs’ assessment scores after WBA implementation.
AB - Background: The principle of workplace based assessment (WBA) is to assess trainees at work with feedback integrated into the program simultaneously. A student driven WBA model was introduced and perception evaluation of this teaching method was done subsequently by taking feedback from the faculty as well as the postgraduate trainees (PGs) of a residency program. Methods: Descriptive multimethod study was conducted. A WBA program was designed for PGs in Chemical Pathology on Moodle and forms utilized were case-based discussion (CBD), direct observation of practical skills (DOPS) and evaluation of clinical events (ECE). Consented assessors and PGs were trained on WBA through a workshop. Pretest and posttest to assess PGs knowledge before and after WBA were conducted. Every time a WBA form was filled, perception of PGs and assessors towards WBA, time taken to conduct single WBA and feedback were recorded. Faculty and PGs qualitative feedback on perception of WBA was taken via interviews. WBA tools data and qualitative feedback were used to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the new tools. Results: Six eligible PGs and seventeen assessors participated in this study. A total of 79 CBDs (assessors n = 7 and PGs n = 6), 12 ECEs (assessors n = 6 and PGs n = 5), and 20 DOPS (assessors n = 6 and PGs n = 6) were documented. PGs average pretest score was 55.6%, which was improved to 96.4% in posttest; p value< 0.05. Scores of annual assessment before and after implementation of WBA also showed significant improvement, p value 0.039, Overall mean time taken to evaluate PG’s was 12.6 ± 9.9 min and feedback time 9.2 ± 7.4 min. Mean WBA process satisfaction of assessors and PGs on Likert scale of 1 to 10 was 8 ± 1 and 8.3 ± 0.8 respectively. Conclusion: Both assessors and fellows were satisfied with introduction and implementation of WBA. It gave the fellows opportunity to interact with assessors more often and learn from their rich experience. Gain in knowledge of PGs was identified from the statistically significant improvement in PGs’ assessment scores after WBA implementation.
KW - Chemical pathology
KW - Faculty training and engagement
KW - Feedback
KW - Formative assessment
KW - Residency
KW - Trainee development
KW - Virtual learning environment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093949988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12909-020-02299-8
DO - 10.1186/s12909-020-02299-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 33097037
AN - SCOPUS:85093949988
VL - 20
JO - BMC Medical Education
JF - BMC Medical Education
IS - 1
M1 - 383
ER -