TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022
AU - Chander, Subhash
AU - Luhana, Sindhu
AU - Sadarat, Fnu
AU - Leys, Lorenzo
AU - Parkash, Om
AU - Kumari, Roopa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Females and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the first and senior authorships positions of academic publications. This stems from various structural and systemic inequalities and discrimination in the journal peer-review process, as well as educational, institutional, and organizational cultures. Methods: A retrospective bibliometric study design was used to investigate the representation of gender and racial/ethnic groups in the authorship of critical care randomized controlled trials in 12 high-impact journals from 2000 to 2022. Results: In the 1398 randomized controlled trials included in this study, only 24.61% of the first authors and 16.6% of the senior authors were female. Although female authorship increased during the study period, authorship was significantly higher for males throughout (Chi-square for trend, p < 0.0001). The educational attainment [χ 2(4) = 99.2, p < 0.0001] and the country of the author's affiliated institution [χ 2(42) = 70.3, p = 0.0029] were significantly associated with gender. Male authorship was significantly more prevalent in 10 out of 12 journals analyzed in this study [χ 2(11) = 110.1, p < 0.0001]. The most common race/ethnic group in our study population was White (85.1% women, 85.4% males), followed by Asians (14.3% females, 14.3% males). Although there was a significant increase in the number of non-White authors between 2000 and 2022 [χ 2(22) = 77.3, p < 0.0001], the trend was driven by an increase in non-White male and not non-White female authors. Race/ethnicity was significantly associated with the country of the author’s affiliated institution [χ 2(41) = 1107, p < 0.0001] but not with gender or educational attainment. Conclusions: Persistent gender and racial disparities in high-impact medical and critical care journals underscore the need to revise policies and strategies to encourage greater diversity in critical care research.
AB - Background: Females and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the first and senior authorships positions of academic publications. This stems from various structural and systemic inequalities and discrimination in the journal peer-review process, as well as educational, institutional, and organizational cultures. Methods: A retrospective bibliometric study design was used to investigate the representation of gender and racial/ethnic groups in the authorship of critical care randomized controlled trials in 12 high-impact journals from 2000 to 2022. Results: In the 1398 randomized controlled trials included in this study, only 24.61% of the first authors and 16.6% of the senior authors were female. Although female authorship increased during the study period, authorship was significantly higher for males throughout (Chi-square for trend, p < 0.0001). The educational attainment [χ 2(4) = 99.2, p < 0.0001] and the country of the author's affiliated institution [χ 2(42) = 70.3, p = 0.0029] were significantly associated with gender. Male authorship was significantly more prevalent in 10 out of 12 journals analyzed in this study [χ 2(11) = 110.1, p < 0.0001]. The most common race/ethnic group in our study population was White (85.1% women, 85.4% males), followed by Asians (14.3% females, 14.3% males). Although there was a significant increase in the number of non-White authors between 2000 and 2022 [χ 2(22) = 77.3, p < 0.0001], the trend was driven by an increase in non-White male and not non-White female authors. Race/ethnicity was significantly associated with the country of the author’s affiliated institution [χ 2(41) = 1107, p < 0.0001] but not with gender or educational attainment. Conclusions: Persistent gender and racial disparities in high-impact medical and critical care journals underscore the need to revise policies and strategies to encourage greater diversity in critical care research.
KW - Authorship
KW - Critical care
KW - Ethnic disparities
KW - Gender disparities
KW - RTCs
KW - Racial disparities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163726338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13613-023-01157-2
DO - 10.1186/s13613-023-01157-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163726338
SN - 2110-5820
VL - 13
JO - Annals of Intensive Care
JF - Annals of Intensive Care
IS - 1
M1 - 56
ER -