Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genetic and Clinical Characterization of a Large Cohort with Suspected Monogenic Stone Disease

  • Andrea G. Cogal
  • , Ahmed E. Ali
  • , Muhammad G. Arnous
  • , Abdulmueti Alhadi
  • , Le Ting Zhou
  • , Jennifer Arroyo
  • , Barbara M. Seide
  • , Kalina J. Rossler
  • , Laura M. Reynolds
  • , Gabrielle N. Kennedy
  • , Doaa E. Elbarougy
  • , David S. Goldfarb
  • , Dawn S. Milliner
  • , David J. Sas
  • , John C. Lieske
  • , Peter C. Harris
  • , Justin Campagna
  • , Jamsheer Talati
  • , Muhammad Matteen
  • , Syed Raziuddin Biyabani
  • Imrad Jalbani, Keith Petras, Evangelia Gole, Nikoleta Printza, Smitha Thomas-Mathew, Bill Samm, Scott Baker, Elizabeth Lorenz, Peter Steinberg, Anne Beck, Dechu Puliyanda, Kristin Devor, Salman Tatir Shafi, Anja Pfau, Bradley Kalinsky, Michel Baum, Erin Kim, Hyunjung Shin, Lindsay Armstrong, Stephanie Jernigan, Margret Bock, Michelle Baum, Manpreet Grewal, Gabriela Alegria-Torres, Christopher Larosa, Melissa Cadnapaphornchai, Larry Copelovitch, Erin Kim, Tom George, Melissa Muff-Luett, Sarah Couser, Stephanie Benoit, Xiangling Wang, Kimberly Slocombe, Christine Sethna, Brooke Blazius, Long Tran, Peter Juran, Kalpana Vuppali, John Foreman, Eric Chapman, Upal Sengupta, Robert Jackson, Keith Eidman, Robyn Wilson, Rachel Pearl, Ekaterini Siomou, Sawsen Abroug, Alan Wasserstein, Sharon Moe, James Lingeman, Davoud Mohtat, Randala Lakkis, Carol Wierenga, Rebecca Ruebner, Alicia Neu, Aalia Akber, Anne Salyer, Jyoti Sharma, Debora Matossian, Jerome Lane, Priya Verghese, Vidhi Dalal, Jacob Kohlenberg, Mirna Boumitri, Yoav Segal, Marie Tanzer, Caroline Straatmann, Robert Haws, Brian Eisner, Ivan Porter, Michael Mao, Sandhya Manohar, Fouad Chebib, Suzanne Norby, Andrew Rule, Cheryl Tran, Christian Hanna, Gary Schwartz, Ginny Dines, Kurt Kennel, Ladan Zand, Marie Hogan, Peter Tebben, Ralitza Gavrilova, Ross Avant, Stephen Erickson, Vicente Torres, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Xia Zhou, Mira Keddis, Caroline Prochnau, Ann Kaminski, Anthony Polcari, Reham Almardini, Jessica Slocum, Vera Stricevic, Hiren Patel, Kirsten Kusumi, Ranine Ghamrawi, Michael Lambert, Lada Beara Lasic, Minesh Khatri, Juhi Kumar, Yaakov Liss, Ramapriya Sinnakirouchenan, Amy Krambeck, Vinay Rims, Amira Al-Uzri, Martin Turman, Sheena Sharma, Michael Schlesinger, Jessica Stahl, Matthew Eison, Ari Auron, Anne O'Hare, Nivedita Kamath, Hina Trivedi, Harold Sirota, Michael Aigbe, Joshua Lesses, Naziha Rhuma, Ita Pfeferman Heilberg, Dean Assimos, Lisa Harvey, Panagiotis Kompotiatis, Anthony Portale, Cheng Cheng, Erica Winnicki, Marsha Lee, Frederic Coe, Gajapathiraju Chamarthi, Maury Pinsk, Jamshid Amanzadeh, Sara Elfering, Ayesa Mian, Rebecca Monk, Margaret Pearle, Brianna Gutierrez, Mary James, Yeshwanter Radhakrishnan, Anthony Langone, Julia B. Lewis, Andrew Weiss, Jorge Gutierrez, Anthony Bleyer, Damien Bolton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Key Points – Genetic testing of individuals suspected of monogenic urinary stone disease resolved 34% of families with 22 different genes detected. Resolved individuals had a lower baseline and last visit eGFR and earlier age of stone presentation than the unresolved group. Specific phenotypes and younger diagnostic age were associated with a monogenic cause, allowing refinement of future screenings. Background – Urinary stone disease with a clear genetic cause, monogenic stone disease (MSD), is increasingly recognized as a significant proportion of the total population. When MSD is suspected, genetic testing provides a firm diagnosis that can alter management and treatment. Here, we present testing results from a large cohort with suspected MSD.Methods – Patients with features suggestive of MSD (early onset, family history, frequent stones, nephrocalcinosis [NC], and/or CKD) were recruited by the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium and genotyped for up to 160 known or candidate MSD genes via a targeted massively parallel sequencing panel. We compared clinical and biochemical features between genetically resolved MSD and unresolved individuals.Results – Of 426 families (657 patients) enrolled, 145 (34%) were resolved with identified disease associated variants in 22 known MSD genes. Ninety-nine families were biallelic, 37 monoallelic, and two digenic. An additional 21 of the 231 screened family members were resolved. Genes identified in ten or more families include the following: AGXT, HOGA1, SLC34A3, CYP24A1, SLC3A1, and CLCN5. Compared with the unresolved group, MSD probands had a lower baseline and last visit eGFR, earlier age of stone presentation, and more stone events and procedures/year of life. The resolve rate was higher in those <16 years, and NC was seen earlier in the MSD group. Overall, NC was a risk factor for lower eGFR. Among the specific disorders, patients with primary hyperoxaluria had the earliest age of stone and NC diagnosis, and as expected, the highest urinary oxalate level.Conclusions – Our study emphasizes the value of selecting patients enriched for factors associated with MSD, and comprehensive genetic testing to achieve a high yield of genetic diagnoses. Significant clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with MSD were defined. A definitive MSD diagnosis facilitates individualized management and strategies to delay disease progression in probands and affected family members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1670-1682
Number of pages13
JournalClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • CKD
  • genetics and development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic and Clinical Characterization of a Large Cohort with Suspected Monogenic Stone Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this