TY - JOUR
T1 - Gestational weight gain in 4 low- And middle-income countries and associations with birth outcomes
T2 - a secondary analysis of the Women First Trial
AU - Women First Preconception Trial Group
AU - Bauserman, Melissa S.
AU - Bann, Carla M.
AU - Hambidge, K. Michael
AU - Garces, Ana L.
AU - Figueroa, Lester
AU - Westcott, Jamie L.
AU - Patterson, Jackie K.
AU - Mcclure, Elizabeth M.
AU - Thorsten, Vanessa R.
AU - Aziz, Sumera Ali
AU - Saleem, Sarah
AU - Goldenberg, Robert L.
AU - Derman, Richard J.
AU - Herekar, Veena
AU - Somannavar, Manjunath
AU - Koso-Thomas, Marion W.
AU - Lokangaka, Adrien L.
AU - Tshefu, Antoinette K.
AU - Krebs, Nancy F.
AU - Bose, Carl L.
AU - Goudar, Shivaprasad
AU - Dhaded, Sangappa
AU - Kodkany, Bhalchandra
AU - Pasha, Omrana
AU - Das, Abhik
AU - Miodovnik, Menachem
AU - Tonse, N. K.Raju
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) GrantNumber OPP1055867 and The Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD and the Office of Dietary Supplements, NIH U10 HD 076474. BMGF did not have a role in the design, implementation, analyses, or interpretation of the data.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Background: Adequate gestational weight gain (GWG) is essential for healthy fetal growth. However, in low- and middle-income countries, where malnutrition is prevalent, little information is available about GWG and how it might be modified by nutritional status and interventions. Objective: We describe GWG and its associations with fetal growth and birth outcomes. We also examined the extent to which prepregnancy BMI, and preconception and early weight gain modify GWG, and its effects on fetal growth. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Women First Trial, including 2331 women within the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Guatemala, India, and Pakistan, evaluating weight gain from enrollment to ∼12 weeks of gestation and GWG velocity (kg/wk) between ∼12 and 32 weeks of gestation. Adequacy of GWG velocity was compared with 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations, according to maternal BMI. Early weight gain (EWG), GWG velocity, and adequacy of GWG were related to birth outcomes using linear and Poisson models. Results: GWG velocity (mean ± SD) varied by site: 0.22 ± 0.15 kg/wk in DRC, 0.30 ± 0.23 in Pakistan, 0.31 ± 0.14 in Guatemala, and 0.39 ± 0.13 in India, (P <0.0001). An increase of 0.1 kg/wk in maternal GWG was associated with a 0.13 cm (95% CI: 0.07, 0.18, P <0.001) increase in birth length and a 0.032 kg (0.022, 0.042, P <0.001) increase in birth weight. Compared to women with inadequate GWG, women who had adequate GWG delivered newborns with a higher mean length and weight: 47.98 ± 2.04 cm compared with 47.40 ± 2.17 cm (P <0.001) and 2.864 ± 0.425 kg compared with 2.764 ± 0.418 kg (P <0.001). Baseline BMI, EWG, and GWG were all associated with birth length and weight. Conclusions: These results underscore the importance of adequate maternal nutrition both before and during pregnancy as a potentially modifiable factor to improve fetal growth.
AB - Background: Adequate gestational weight gain (GWG) is essential for healthy fetal growth. However, in low- and middle-income countries, where malnutrition is prevalent, little information is available about GWG and how it might be modified by nutritional status and interventions. Objective: We describe GWG and its associations with fetal growth and birth outcomes. We also examined the extent to which prepregnancy BMI, and preconception and early weight gain modify GWG, and its effects on fetal growth. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Women First Trial, including 2331 women within the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Guatemala, India, and Pakistan, evaluating weight gain from enrollment to ∼12 weeks of gestation and GWG velocity (kg/wk) between ∼12 and 32 weeks of gestation. Adequacy of GWG velocity was compared with 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations, according to maternal BMI. Early weight gain (EWG), GWG velocity, and adequacy of GWG were related to birth outcomes using linear and Poisson models. Results: GWG velocity (mean ± SD) varied by site: 0.22 ± 0.15 kg/wk in DRC, 0.30 ± 0.23 in Pakistan, 0.31 ± 0.14 in Guatemala, and 0.39 ± 0.13 in India, (P <0.0001). An increase of 0.1 kg/wk in maternal GWG was associated with a 0.13 cm (95% CI: 0.07, 0.18, P <0.001) increase in birth length and a 0.032 kg (0.022, 0.042, P <0.001) increase in birth weight. Compared to women with inadequate GWG, women who had adequate GWG delivered newborns with a higher mean length and weight: 47.98 ± 2.04 cm compared with 47.40 ± 2.17 cm (P <0.001) and 2.864 ± 0.425 kg compared with 2.764 ± 0.418 kg (P <0.001). Baseline BMI, EWG, and GWG were all associated with birth length and weight. Conclusions: These results underscore the importance of adequate maternal nutrition both before and during pregnancy as a potentially modifiable factor to improve fetal growth.
KW - developing countries
KW - fetal development
KW - gestational weight gain
KW - infant nutrition disorders
KW - low birth weight
KW - malnutrition
KW - nutrition during pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112293395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ajcn/nqab086
DO - 10.1093/ajcn/nqab086
M3 - Article
C2 - 33876178
AN - SCOPUS:85112293395
SN - 0002-9165
VL - 114
SP - 804
EP - 812
JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 2
ER -