Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy

Paula S. Ginter, Romana Idress, Timothy M. D’Alfonso, Susan Fineberg, Shabnam Jaffer, Abida K. Sattar, Anees Chagpar, Parker Wilson, Malini Harigopal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


Breast carcinoma grading is an important prognostic feature recently incorporated into the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. There is increased interest in applying virtual microscopy (VM) using digital whole slide imaging (WSI) more broadly. Little is known regarding concordance in grading using VM and how such variability might affect AJCC prognostic staging (PS). We evaluated interobserver variability amongst a multi-institutional group of breast pathologists using digital WSI and how discrepancies in grading would affect PS. A digitally scanned slide from 143 invasive carcinomas was independently reviewed by 6 pathologists and assigned grades based on established criteria for tubule formation (TF), nuclear pleomorphism (NP), and mitotic count (MC). Statistical analysis was performed. Interobserver agreement for grade was moderate (κ = 0.497). Agreement was fair (κ = 0.375), moderate (κ = 0.491), and good (κ = 0.705) for grades 2, 3, and 1, respectively. Observer pair concordance ranged from fair to good (κ = 0.354–0.684) Perfect agreement was observed in 43 cases (30%). Interobserver agreement for the individual components was best for TF (κ = 0.503) and worst for MC (κ = 0.281). Seventeen of 86 (19.8%) discrepant cases would have resulted in changes in PS and discrepancies most frequently resulted in a PS change from IA to IB (n = 9). For two of these nine cases, Oncotype DX results would have led to a PS of 1A regardless of grade. Using VM, a multi-institutional cohort of pathologists showed moderate concordance for breast cancer grading, similar to studies using light microscopy. Agreement was the best at the extremes of grade and for evaluation of TF. Whether the higher variability noted for MC is a consequence of VM grading warrants further investigation. Discordance in grading infrequently leads to clinically meaningful changes in the prognostic stage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)701-709
Number of pages9
JournalModern Pathology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this