Abstract
Objective To develop a standardized process for reviewing daily patient lists and identifying potential risks of misidentification. Our goal was to develop a proactive approach to identify and eliminate risks of patient misidentification. Methods Assessment of current patient identification practices took place over a period of 4 weeks. Using a process map, a patient survey was developed to determine the encounter points when patient identification was confirmed. This information was used to develop a standardized protocol for review of daily appointment lists. Results Review of daily appointment lists was completed to identify potential similar/same name risks. A standardized manual process of chart review, flagging, and tracking was developed. Conclusions The name alert process resulted in a simple manual process for identifying which patients have a higher name risk and allowed care providers to take preventative action to decrease potential risk of incorrect diagnostic testing, procedure, or medication administration.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 564-569 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving patient identification in an ophthalmology clinic using name alerts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver