TY - JOUR
T1 - Including ultrasound scans in antenatal care in low-resource settings
T2 - Considering the complementarity of obstetric ultrasound screening and maternity waiting homes in strengthening referral systems in low-resource, rural settings
AU - Swanson, David L.
AU - Franklin, Holly L.
AU - Swanson, Jonathan O.
AU - Goldenberg, Robert L.
AU - McClure, Elizabeth M.
AU - Mirza, Waseem
AU - Muyodi, David
AU - Figueroa, Lester
AU - Goldsmith, Nicole
AU - Kanaiza, Nancy
AU - Naqvi, Farnaz
AU - Pineda, Irma Sayury
AU - López-Gomez, Walter
AU - Hamsumonde, Dorothy
AU - Bolamba, Victor Lokomba
AU - Newman, Jamie E.
AU - Fogleman, Elizabeth V.
AU - Saleem, Sarah
AU - Esamai, Fabian
AU - Bucher, Sherri
AU - Liechty, Edward A.
AU - Garces, Ana L.
AU - Krebs, Nancy F.
AU - Hambidge, K. Michael
AU - Chomba, Elwyn
AU - Bauserman, Melissa
AU - Mwenechanya, Musaku
AU - Carlo, Waldemar A.
AU - Tshefu, Antoinette
AU - Lokangaka, Adrien
AU - Bose, Carl L.
AU - Nathan, Robert O.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was conducted by sites of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research through grants from NICHD to the sites and to RTI International, the data coordination center. Funding for the trial also was provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: OPP1056057 to the sites with additional funding to RTI. General Electric provided the ultrasound units to the sites and in addition provided support to the Radiology Department of the University of Washington for the training component of the study. None of the funders were involved in the data analysis or writing any of the manuscripts using data from this study. FIRST LOOK: Ultrasound Study Investigators and Lead Sonographers include Democratic Republic of Congo Site: Antoinette Tshefu, MD, Adrien Lokangaka, MD, and Victor Lokomba Bolamba, MD, University of Kinshasa School of Public Health; Carl Bose, MD; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Zambia Site: Elwyn Chomba, MBChB, DCH, MRCP, Musaku Mwenechanya, MD, and Dorothy Hamsumonde, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia; Wally Carlo, MD, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama; Guatemala Site: Ana Garces, MD, MPH, Lester Figueroa, MD, and Irma Sayury Pineda, MD, Instituto de Nutrición de Centroamérica y Panamá (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala; Michael Hambidge, MD and Nancy Krebs, MD, University of Colorado Health Care System (UCHSC), Denver, Colorado; Pakistan Site: Omrana Pasha, MD, Sarah Saleem, MD, Farnaz Naqvi, MSc, and Waseem Mirza, MD, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; Robert Goldenberg, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY; Kenya Site: Fabian Esamai, MBChB, MMed, PhD and David Muyodi, MD, and Nancy Kanaiza Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya, Ed Liechty, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and the Data Coordinating Center: Elizabeth McClure, PhD; Dennis Wallace, PhD and Holly Franklin, MPH, Research Triangle Institute, Durham NC. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD): Menachem Miodovnik, MD and Marion Koso-Thomas, MD, MPH; University of Washington: Robert Nathan, MD; Jonathan Swanson, MD and David Swanson, MIDP, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Funding Information:
The study was conducted by sites of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research through grants from NICHD to the sites and to RTI International, the data coordination center. Funding for the trial also was provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation : OPP1056057 to the sites with additional funding to RTI. General Electric provided the ultrasound units to the sites and in addition provided support to the Radiology Department of the University of Washington for the training component of the study. None of the funders were involved in the data analysis or writing any of the manuscripts using data from this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Recent World Health Organization (WHO) antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The First Look Study, referenced in the WHO recommendation, subsequently shows that the routine use of ultrasound during antenatal care in rural, low-income settings did not improve maternal, fetal or neonatal mortality, nor did it increase women's use of antenatal care or the rate of hospital births. This article reviews the First Look Study, reconsidering the assumptions upon which it was built in light of these results, a supplemental descriptive study of interviews with patients and sonographers that participated in the First Look study intervention, and a review of the literature. Two themes surface from this review. The first is that focused emphasis on building the pregnancy risk screening skills of rural primary health care personnel may not lead to adaptations in referral hospital processes that could benefit the patient accordingly. The second is that agency to improve the quality of patient reception at referral hospitals may need to be manufactured for obstetric ultrasound screening, or remote pregnancy risk screening more generally, to have the desired impact. Stemming from the literature, this article goes on to examine the potential for complementarity between obstetric ultrasound screening and another approach encouraged by the WHO, the maternity waiting home. Each approach may address existing shortcomings in how the other is currently understood. This paper concludes by proposing a path toward developing and testing such a hybrid approach.
AB - Recent World Health Organization (WHO) antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The First Look Study, referenced in the WHO recommendation, subsequently shows that the routine use of ultrasound during antenatal care in rural, low-income settings did not improve maternal, fetal or neonatal mortality, nor did it increase women's use of antenatal care or the rate of hospital births. This article reviews the First Look Study, reconsidering the assumptions upon which it was built in light of these results, a supplemental descriptive study of interviews with patients and sonographers that participated in the First Look study intervention, and a review of the literature. Two themes surface from this review. The first is that focused emphasis on building the pregnancy risk screening skills of rural primary health care personnel may not lead to adaptations in referral hospital processes that could benefit the patient accordingly. The second is that agency to improve the quality of patient reception at referral hospitals may need to be manufactured for obstetric ultrasound screening, or remote pregnancy risk screening more generally, to have the desired impact. Stemming from the literature, this article goes on to examine the potential for complementarity between obstetric ultrasound screening and another approach encouraged by the WHO, the maternity waiting home. Each approach may address existing shortcomings in how the other is currently understood. This paper concludes by proposing a path toward developing and testing such a hybrid approach.
KW - Continuum of care
KW - Maternity waiting home
KW - Midwifery
KW - Pregnancy risk screening
KW - Referral systems
KW - Task shifting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064080353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.017
DO - 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.017
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30979599
AN - SCOPUS:85064080353
SN - 0146-0005
VL - 43
SP - 273
EP - 281
JO - Seminars in Perinatology
JF - Seminars in Perinatology
IS - 5
ER -