TY - JOUR
T1 - Innovation in ethics and professionalism course
T2 - Early experience with portfolio-workbook
AU - Shamim, Muhammad Shahid
AU - Zubairi, Nadeem Alam
AU - Sayed, Mohamad Hesham
AU - Gazzaz, Zohair Jamil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Pakistan Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/9
Y1 - 2016/9
N2 - Objective: To analyse students' perception regarding the use of portfolio-workbook in ethics course. Methods: This mixed method study was conducted at the King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 2014, and comprised fourth-year medical students. The "portfolio-workbook", developed on principles of cognitive load and guided learning theories, contained essential reading material. Learning sessions were also facilitated by teaching tools like role-plays, movie/video clips, vignettes, etc., followed by reflective writing exercises. Feedback questionnaire with open- and closed-ended questions was used to collect data. Quantitative data was analysed for frequencies and percentages. Content analysis was conducted for the open-ended responses. Results: Of the 20 participants, 10(50%) considered using portfolio-workbook as difficult initially. However, on completion of module 16(80%) found it easy. Moreover, 17(85%) appreciated it as a learning tool. Besides, 19(95%) students found teaching videos and 13(65%) found open discussions as effective learning tools. Portfolio-workbook as an assessment tool was preferred by 19(95%) students. Conclusion: The use of portfolio-workbook in teaching ethics to undergraduates was found to be encouraging as it generated interest and interaction.
AB - Objective: To analyse students' perception regarding the use of portfolio-workbook in ethics course. Methods: This mixed method study was conducted at the King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 2014, and comprised fourth-year medical students. The "portfolio-workbook", developed on principles of cognitive load and guided learning theories, contained essential reading material. Learning sessions were also facilitated by teaching tools like role-plays, movie/video clips, vignettes, etc., followed by reflective writing exercises. Feedback questionnaire with open- and closed-ended questions was used to collect data. Quantitative data was analysed for frequencies and percentages. Content analysis was conducted for the open-ended responses. Results: Of the 20 participants, 10(50%) considered using portfolio-workbook as difficult initially. However, on completion of module 16(80%) found it easy. Moreover, 17(85%) appreciated it as a learning tool. Besides, 19(95%) students found teaching videos and 13(65%) found open discussions as effective learning tools. Portfolio-workbook as an assessment tool was preferred by 19(95%) students. Conclusion: The use of portfolio-workbook in teaching ethics to undergraduates was found to be encouraging as it generated interest and interaction.
KW - Medical ethics
KW - Portfolio
KW - Professionalism
KW - Undergraduate
KW - Workbook
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981328150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 27654737
AN - SCOPUS:84981328150
SN - 0030-9982
VL - 66
SP - 1149
EP - 1153
JO - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
IS - 9
ER -