TY - JOUR
T1 - Intensity of Lipid Lowering With Statin Therapy in Patients With Cerebrovascular Disease Versus Coronary Artery Disease
T2 - Insights from the PALM Registry
AU - Xian, Ying
AU - Navar, Ann Marie
AU - Li, Shuang
AU - Li, Zhuokai
AU - Robinson, Jennifer
AU - Virani, Salim S.
AU - Louie, Michael J.
AU - Koren, Andrew
AU - Goldberg, Anne
AU - Roger, Veronique L.
AU - Wilson, Peter W.F.
AU - Peterson, Eric D.
AU - Wang, Tracy Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Sanofi Pharmaceuticals and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr Navar receives research grants from Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Janssen, Amarin and NHLBI (K01HL133416), and acts as a consultant and advisory board member for Amgen, Amarin, Sanofi, Regeneron, Astra Zeneca, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Robinson receives research grants to Institution from Acasti, Amarin, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Esai, Esperion, Merck, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda and acts as a consultant for Amgen, Medicines Company, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi. Dr Virani receives research grants from the American Heart Association, American Diabetes Association, and Veterans Affairs; honoraria from American College of Cardiology and National Lipid Association. Dr Goldberg receives research grants to institution: Amarin, Amgen, IONIS, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi. Consultant: Sanofi/Regeneron, AKCEA, Novartis, Esperion, 23andMe. Editorial: Merck Manual. Dr Koren is an employee of Sanofi. Dr Louie is an employee of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Dr Peterson receives research grants from Amgen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Merck and fees as a consultant and advisory board member to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Merck, and Sanofi Aventis. Dr Wang receives research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cryolife, Novartis, Pfizer, Portola, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and honoraria from Gilead, and Grifols. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by Sanofi Pharmaceuticals and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors and Mayo Clinic. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Background: Current treatment guidelines strongly recommend statin therapy for secondary prevention. However, it remains unclear whether patients’ perceptions of cardiovascular risk, beliefs on cholesterol, or the intensity of prescribed statin therapy differs for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) versus cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) versus both CAD and CeVD (CAD&CeVD). Methods and Results: The PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) registry collected data on statin use, intensity, and core laboratory low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for 3232 secondary prevention patients treated at 133 US clinics. Among individuals with CeVD only (n=403), CAD only (n=2202), and CeVD&CAD (n=627), no significant differences were observed in patient-perceived cardiovascular disease risk, beliefs on cholesterol lowering, or perceived effectiveness and safety of statin therapy. However, patients with CeVD only were less likely to receive any statin therapy (76.2% versus 86.2%; adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.45–0.91), or guideline-recommended statin intensity (34.6% versus 50.4%; adjusted odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.81) than those with CAD only. Individuals with CeVD only were also less likely to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL (59.2% versus 69.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.99) than individuals with CAD alone. There were no significant differences in the use of any statin therapy or guideline-recommended statin intensity between individuals with CAD&CeVD and those with CAD only. Conclusions: Despite lack of significant differences in patient-perceived cardiovascular risk or statin beliefs, patients with CeVD were significantly less likely to receive higher intensity statin or achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL than those with CAD only.
AB - Background: Current treatment guidelines strongly recommend statin therapy for secondary prevention. However, it remains unclear whether patients’ perceptions of cardiovascular risk, beliefs on cholesterol, or the intensity of prescribed statin therapy differs for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) versus cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) versus both CAD and CeVD (CAD&CeVD). Methods and Results: The PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) registry collected data on statin use, intensity, and core laboratory low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for 3232 secondary prevention patients treated at 133 US clinics. Among individuals with CeVD only (n=403), CAD only (n=2202), and CeVD&CAD (n=627), no significant differences were observed in patient-perceived cardiovascular disease risk, beliefs on cholesterol lowering, or perceived effectiveness and safety of statin therapy. However, patients with CeVD only were less likely to receive any statin therapy (76.2% versus 86.2%; adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.45–0.91), or guideline-recommended statin intensity (34.6% versus 50.4%; adjusted odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.81) than those with CAD only. Individuals with CeVD only were also less likely to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL (59.2% versus 69.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.99) than individuals with CAD alone. There were no significant differences in the use of any statin therapy or guideline-recommended statin intensity between individuals with CAD&CeVD and those with CAD only. Conclusions: Despite lack of significant differences in patient-perceived cardiovascular risk or statin beliefs, patients with CeVD were significantly less likely to receive higher intensity statin or achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL than those with CAD only.
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - quality of care
KW - secondary prevention
KW - statin
KW - stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072680154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.119.013229
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.119.013229
M3 - Article
C2 - 31554462
AN - SCOPUS:85072680154
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 8
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 19
M1 - e013229
ER -