TY - JOUR
T1 - Intrapartum oral azithromycin for maternal infection prophylaxis and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage
T2 - A secondary analysis of the A-PLUS trial
AU - for the A-PLUS Trial Group
AU - Sidze, Larissa
AU - Moore, Janet L.
AU - Carlo, Waldemar A.
AU - Mwenechanya, Musaku
AU - Chomba, Elwyn
AU - Hemingway-Foday, Jennifer J.
AU - Kavi, Avinash
AU - Metgud, Mrityunjay C.
AU - Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
AU - Derman, Richard
AU - Lokangaka, Adrien L.
AU - Tshefu, Antoinette K.
AU - Bauserman, Melissa S.
AU - Bose, Carl L.
AU - Shivkumar, Poonam
AU - Waikar, Manjushri
AU - Patel, Archana B.
AU - Hibberd, Patricia L.
AU - Nyongesa, Paul
AU - Esamai, Fabian
AU - Ekhaguere, Osayame A.
AU - Bucher, Sherri L.
AU - Jessani, Saleem
AU - Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder
AU - Saleem, Sarah
AU - Goldenberg, Robert L.
AU - Billah, Sk Masum
AU - Lennox, Ruth
AU - Haque, Rashidul
AU - Petri, William A.
AU - Figueroa, Lester
AU - Mazariegos, Manolo
AU - Krebs, Nancy F.
AU - Nolen, Tracy L.
AU - Koso-Thomas, Marion
AU - McClure, Elizabeth M.
AU - Tita, Alan T.N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Objective: A single oral dose of azithromycin (AZM) given during labor to women planning a vaginal delivery reduced maternal infections including sepsis, with a stronger effect in sub-Saharan Africa than South Asia. Since maternal infection contributes to labor dysfunction and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), we evaluated the effect of AZM on the risk of PPH and blood transfusion. Methods: This was an unplanned secondary analysis of the Azithromycin Prevention in Labor Use Study (A-PLUS) randomized controlled trial at eight sites in seven low- and middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. The population consisted of pregnant women in labor at ≥28 weeks' gestation in health facilities randomized to either 2 g AZM or placebo. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the risk of PPH and blood transfusion was compared between AZM and placebo arms using Poisson regression adjusting for arm and site as fixed effects. The main outcome measures were (1) PPH (500 mL or greater) after delivery; and (2) postpartum blood transfusion after delivery. Results: A total of 29 278 participants were randomized to APLUS; 14 590 to AZM and 14 688 to placebo. The risk of PPH did not significantly differ between AZM and placebo arms (1.4% in AZM; 1.6% in placebo; relative risk [RR] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73, 1.07). The risk of blood transfusion also did not significantly differ between AZM and placebo arms (0.5% in AZM; 0.5% in placebo; RR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.25). There was also evidence indicating that the effect of AZM on the risk of blood transfusion, but not PPH, was beneficial in sub-Saharan Africa but not in South Asia (P value for two-way interaction = 0.002). Conclusion: A single intrapartum oral dose of AZM did not significantly reduce the overall risk of PPH or blood transfusion. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03871491.
AB - Objective: A single oral dose of azithromycin (AZM) given during labor to women planning a vaginal delivery reduced maternal infections including sepsis, with a stronger effect in sub-Saharan Africa than South Asia. Since maternal infection contributes to labor dysfunction and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), we evaluated the effect of AZM on the risk of PPH and blood transfusion. Methods: This was an unplanned secondary analysis of the Azithromycin Prevention in Labor Use Study (A-PLUS) randomized controlled trial at eight sites in seven low- and middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. The population consisted of pregnant women in labor at ≥28 weeks' gestation in health facilities randomized to either 2 g AZM or placebo. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the risk of PPH and blood transfusion was compared between AZM and placebo arms using Poisson regression adjusting for arm and site as fixed effects. The main outcome measures were (1) PPH (500 mL or greater) after delivery; and (2) postpartum blood transfusion after delivery. Results: A total of 29 278 participants were randomized to APLUS; 14 590 to AZM and 14 688 to placebo. The risk of PPH did not significantly differ between AZM and placebo arms (1.4% in AZM; 1.6% in placebo; relative risk [RR] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73, 1.07). The risk of blood transfusion also did not significantly differ between AZM and placebo arms (0.5% in AZM; 0.5% in placebo; RR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.25). There was also evidence indicating that the effect of AZM on the risk of blood transfusion, but not PPH, was beneficial in sub-Saharan Africa but not in South Asia (P value for two-way interaction = 0.002). Conclusion: A single intrapartum oral dose of AZM did not significantly reduce the overall risk of PPH or blood transfusion. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03871491.
KW - A-PLUS trial
KW - antibiotic prophylaxis
KW - azithromycin (AZM)
KW - blood tranfusion
KW - postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027899505
U2 - 10.1002/ijgo.70777
DO - 10.1002/ijgo.70777
M3 - Article
C2 - 41527950
AN - SCOPUS:105027899505
SN - 0020-7292
JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
ER -