Laproscopic versus open appendectomy: A comparative study

Bushra Shirazi, Naureen Ali, Muhammad Shahid Shamim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of open with laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of postoperative pain, rate of wound infection and hospital stay. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in Deprtment of Surgery, Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi, over a period of six months. Patients undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis were randomly assigned into one of the two groups (A or B) after obtaining written and informed consent. In Group-A patients underwent open appendectomy and in Group B laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Post operatively pain chart and wound infection was recorded and, at the time of discharge, number of days in hospital was calculated. Result: Sixty patients (38 male, 22 female), with clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on Alvarado score of six and above, were included in the study. They were randomized into 2 groups of A and B with 30 patients in each group. Group-A comprised open appendectomy procedure and Group-B comprised laparoscopic appendectomy. Mean comparison of postoperative pain by visual analogue scale, was significantly low in Group B, compared with Group A, on day 0, 1 and 2. Number of days in Hospital was 4.1±0.8 days in Group A and 1.5±0.06 days in Group B. None of the patients in Group B, while 8 (26.67%) patients in-Group A, developed postoperative wound infection at 1 week follow up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective. Wound infection and postoperative pain is significantly lower after this mode of surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)901-904
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Volume60
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laproscopic versus open appendectomy: A comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this