Low cost reconstructive options after musculoskeletal tumour resection in developing countries. Affordable, effective and durable alternatives

Arif Ali, Obada Hasan, Ahmed Habib, Masood Umer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last two, three decades, the overall survival rates for non-metastatic malignant tumours of the bone have dramatically improved. This has become possible due to the recent advances and multidisciplinary approach towards these diseases, specifically the advent of multi-agent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Limb salvage has now become the norm in the treatment of musculoskeletal tumours without compromising on the overall survival and recurrence of the disease. In the era of metal, prosthetic reconstruction has become the standard procedure specifically in the large tumours which involve the joints as this method of reconstruction helps in joint mobility and early weight-bearing. Considering the costs and resource constraints, multiple cost-effective, stable, durable reconstruction options have evolved over the last decade and these have also shown favourable func tional outcomes without compromising on the amount of resection and risk of local recurrence. The current literature review was planned to discuss various cost-effective, durable reconstructive options and their advantages and disadvantages. These include Van ness rotationplasty, allograft, autograft, devitalised tumour bone and Masqueletor induced membrane technique . .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S72-S76
JournalJPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Volume69 1)
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Musculoskeletal, Tumour, Orthopaedic, O nc ology, R econ str uc ti on, Developing country.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low cost reconstructive options after musculoskeletal tumour resection in developing countries. Affordable, effective and durable alternatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this