Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images

Lok Hin Lee, Elizabeth Bradburn, Rachel Craik, Mohammad Yaqub, Shane A. Norris, Leila Cheikh Ismail, Eric O. Ohuma, Fernando C. Barros, Ann Lambert, Maria Carvalho, Yasmin A. Jaffer, Michael Gravett, Manorama Purwar, Qingqing Wu, Enrico Bertino, Shama Munim, Aung Myat Min, Zulfiqar Bhutta, Jose Villar, Stephen H. KennedyJ. Alison Noble, Aris T. Papageorghiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate estimation of gestational age is an essential component of good obstetric care and informs clinical decision-making throughout pregnancy. As the date of the last menstrual period is often unknown or uncertain, ultrasound measurement of fetal size is currently the best method for estimating gestational age. The calculation assumes an average fetal size at each gestational age. The method is accurate in the first trimester, but less so in the second and third trimesters as growth deviates from the average and variation in fetal size increases. Consequently, fetal ultrasound late in pregnancy has a wide margin of error of at least ±2 weeks’ gestation. Here, we utilise state-of-the-art machine learning methods to estimate gestational age using only image analysis of standard ultrasound planes, without any measurement information. The machine learning model is based on ultrasound images from two independent datasets: one for training and internal validation, and another for external validation. During validation, the model was blinded to the ground truth of gestational age (based on a reliable last menstrual period date and confirmatory first-trimester fetal crown rump length). We show that this approach compensates for increases in size variation and is even accurate in cases of intrauterine growth restriction. Our best machine-learning based model estimates gestational age with a mean absolute error of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.9–3.2) and 4.3 (95% CI, 4.1–4.5) days in the second and third trimesters, respectively, which outperforms current ultrasound-based clinical biometry at these gestational ages. Our method for dating the pregnancy in the second and third trimesters is, therefore, more accurate than published methods.

Original languageEnglish
Article number36
Journalnpj Digital Medicine
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this