TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings
T2 - global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method
AU - Thwaites, Louise
AU - Nasa, Prashant
AU - Abbenbroek, Brett
AU - Dat, Vu Quoc
AU - Finfer, Simon
AU - Kwizera, Arthur
AU - Ling, Lowell
AU - Lobo, Suzana M.
AU - Sinto, Robert
AU - Aditianingsih, Dita
AU - Antonelli, Massimo
AU - Arabi, Yaseen M.
AU - Argent, Andrew
AU - Azevedo, Luciano
AU - Bennett, Elizabeth
AU - Chakrabarti, Arunaloke
AU - De Asis, Kevin
AU - De Waele, Jan
AU - Divatia, Jigeeshu Vasishtha
AU - Estenssoro, Elisa
AU - Evans, Laura
AU - Faiz, Abul
AU - Hammond, Naomi E.
AU - Hashmi, Madiha
AU - Herridge, Margaret S.
AU - Jacob, Shevin T.
AU - Jatsho, Jimba
AU - Javeri, Yash
AU - Khalid, Karima
AU - Chen, Lie Khie
AU - Levy, Mitchell
AU - Lundeg, Ganbold
AU - Machado, Flavia R.
AU - Mehta, Yatin
AU - Mer, Mervyn
AU - Son, Do Ngoc
AU - Ospina-Tascón, Gustavo A.
AU - Ostermann, Marlies
AU - Permpikul, Chairat
AU - Prescott, Hallie C.
AU - Reinhart, Konrad
AU - Rodriguez Vega, Gloria
AU - S-Kabara, Halima
AU - Shrestha, Gentle Sunder
AU - Waweru-Siika, Wangari
AU - Tan, Toh Leong
AU - Todi, Subhash
AU - Tripathy, Swagata
AU - Venkatesh, Balasubramaniam
AU - Vincent, Jean Louis
AU - Myatra, Sheila Nainan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: To generate consensus and provide expert clinical practice statements for the management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings. Methods: An international multidisciplinary Steering Committee with expertise in sepsis management and including a Delphi methodologist was convened by the Asia Pacific Sepsis Alliance (APSA). The committee selected an international panel of clinicians and researchers with expertise in sepsis management. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements. Results: A stable consensus was achieved for 30 (94%) of the statements by 41 experts after four survey rounds. These include consensus on managing patients with sepsis outside a designated critical care area, triggers for escalating clinical management and criteria for safe transfer to another facility. The experts agreed on the following: in the absence of serum lactate, clinical parameters such as altered mental status, capillary refill time and urine output may be used to guide resuscitation; special considerations regarding the volume of fluid used for resuscitation, especially in tropical infections, including the use of simple tests to assess fluid responsiveness when facilities for advanced hemodynamic monitoring are limited; use of Ringer’s lactate or Hartmann’s solution as balanced salt solutions; epinephrine when norepinephrine or vasopressin are unavailable; and the administration of vasopressors via a peripheral vein if central venous access is unavailable or not feasible. Similarly, where facilities for investigation are unavailable, there was consensus for empirical antimicrobial administration without delay when sepsis was strongly suspected, as was the empirical use of antiparasitic agents in patients with suspicion of parasitic infections. Conclusion: Using a Delphi method, international experts reached consensus to generate expert clinical practice statements providing guidance to clinicians worldwide on the management of sepsis in resource-limited settings. These statements complement existing guidelines where evidence is lacking and add relevant aspects of sepsis management that are not addressed by current international guidelines. Future studies are needed to assess the effects of these practice statements and address remaining uncertainties.
AB - Purpose: To generate consensus and provide expert clinical practice statements for the management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings. Methods: An international multidisciplinary Steering Committee with expertise in sepsis management and including a Delphi methodologist was convened by the Asia Pacific Sepsis Alliance (APSA). The committee selected an international panel of clinicians and researchers with expertise in sepsis management. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements. Results: A stable consensus was achieved for 30 (94%) of the statements by 41 experts after four survey rounds. These include consensus on managing patients with sepsis outside a designated critical care area, triggers for escalating clinical management and criteria for safe transfer to another facility. The experts agreed on the following: in the absence of serum lactate, clinical parameters such as altered mental status, capillary refill time and urine output may be used to guide resuscitation; special considerations regarding the volume of fluid used for resuscitation, especially in tropical infections, including the use of simple tests to assess fluid responsiveness when facilities for advanced hemodynamic monitoring are limited; use of Ringer’s lactate or Hartmann’s solution as balanced salt solutions; epinephrine when norepinephrine or vasopressin are unavailable; and the administration of vasopressors via a peripheral vein if central venous access is unavailable or not feasible. Similarly, where facilities for investigation are unavailable, there was consensus for empirical antimicrobial administration without delay when sepsis was strongly suspected, as was the empirical use of antiparasitic agents in patients with suspicion of parasitic infections. Conclusion: Using a Delphi method, international experts reached consensus to generate expert clinical practice statements providing guidance to clinicians worldwide on the management of sepsis in resource-limited settings. These statements complement existing guidelines where evidence is lacking and add relevant aspects of sepsis management that are not addressed by current international guidelines. Future studies are needed to assess the effects of these practice statements and address remaining uncertainties.
KW - Anti-infective agents
KW - Delphi methodology
KW - Hemodynamic monitoring
KW - Resource-limited settings
KW - Sepsis
KW - Vasoactive agents
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212821891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-024-07735-7
DO - 10.1007/s00134-024-07735-7
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85212821891
SN - 0342-4642
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
M1 - e006585
ER -