TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixed methods study protocol for combining stakeholder-led rapid evaluation with near real-time continuous registry data to facilitate evaluations of quality of care in intensive care units
AU - The Collaboration for Research, Implementation and Training in Critical Care in Asia and Africa (CCAA)
AU - Rashan, Aasiyah
AU - Beane, Abi
AU - Ghose, Aniruddha
AU - Dondorp, Arjen M.
AU - Kwizera, Arthur
AU - Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi
AU - Biccard, Bruce
AU - Righy, Cassia
AU - Thwaites, C. Louise
AU - Pell, Christopher
AU - Sendagire, Cornelius
AU - Thomson, David
AU - Done, Dilanthi Gamage
AU - Aryal, Diptesh
AU - Wagstaff, Duncan
AU - Nadia, Farah
AU - Putoto, Giovanni
AU - Panaru, Hem
AU - Udayanga, Ishara
AU - Amuasi, John
AU - Salluh, Jorge
AU - Gokhale, Krishna
AU - Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah
AU - Pisani, Luigi
AU - Hashmi, Madiha
AU - Schultz, Marcus
AU - Ghalib, Maryam Shamal
AU - Mukaka, Mavuto
AU - Mat-Nor, Mohammed Basri
AU - Siaw-frimpong, Moses
AU - Surenthirakumaran, Rajendra
AU - Haniffa, Rashan
AU - Kaddu, Ronnie P.
AU - Pereira, Snehal Pinto
AU - Murthy, Srinivas
AU - Harris, Steve
AU - Moonesinghe, Suneetha Ramani
AU - Vengadasalam, Sutharshan
AU - Tripathy, Swagata
AU - Gooden, Tiffany E.
AU - Tolppa, Timo
AU - Pari, Vrindha
AU - Waweru-Siika, Wangari
AU - Minh, Yen Lam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2023 The Collaboration for Research, Implementation and Training in Critical Care in Asia and Africa (CCAA) et al.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Improved access to healthcare in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not equated to improved health outcomes. Absence or unsustained quality of care is partly to blame. Improving outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs) requires delivery of complex interventions by multiple specialties working in concert, and the simultaneous prevention of avoidable harms associated with the illness and the treatment interventions. Therefore, successful design and implementation of improvement interventions requires understanding of the behavioural, organisational, and external factors that determine care delivery and the likelihood of achieving sustained improvement. We aim to identify care processes that contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes in ICUs located in LMICs and to establish barriers and enablers for improving the care processes. Methods: Using rapid evaluation methods, we will use four data collection methods: 1) registry embedded indicators to assess quality of care processes and their associated outcomes; 2) process mapping to provide a preliminary framework to understand gaps between current and desired care practices; 3) structured observations of processes of interest identified from the process mapping and; 4) focus group discussions with stakeholders to identify barriers and enablers influencing the gap between current and desired care practices. We will also collect self-assessments of readiness for quality improvement. Data collection and analysis will be led by local stakeholders, performed in parallel and through an iterative process across eight countries: Kenya, India, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan, South Africa, Uganda and Vietnam. Conclusions: The results of our study will provide essential information on where and how care processes can be improved to facilitate better quality of care to critically ill patients in LMICs; thus, reduce preventable mortality and morbidity in ICUs. Furthermore, understanding the rapid evaluation methods that will be used for this study will allow other researchers and healthcare professionals to carry out similar research in ICUs and other health services.
AB - Background: Improved access to healthcare in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not equated to improved health outcomes. Absence or unsustained quality of care is partly to blame. Improving outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs) requires delivery of complex interventions by multiple specialties working in concert, and the simultaneous prevention of avoidable harms associated with the illness and the treatment interventions. Therefore, successful design and implementation of improvement interventions requires understanding of the behavioural, organisational, and external factors that determine care delivery and the likelihood of achieving sustained improvement. We aim to identify care processes that contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes in ICUs located in LMICs and to establish barriers and enablers for improving the care processes. Methods: Using rapid evaluation methods, we will use four data collection methods: 1) registry embedded indicators to assess quality of care processes and their associated outcomes; 2) process mapping to provide a preliminary framework to understand gaps between current and desired care practices; 3) structured observations of processes of interest identified from the process mapping and; 4) focus group discussions with stakeholders to identify barriers and enablers influencing the gap between current and desired care practices. We will also collect self-assessments of readiness for quality improvement. Data collection and analysis will be led by local stakeholders, performed in parallel and through an iterative process across eight countries: Kenya, India, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan, South Africa, Uganda and Vietnam. Conclusions: The results of our study will provide essential information on where and how care processes can be improved to facilitate better quality of care to critically ill patients in LMICs; thus, reduce preventable mortality and morbidity in ICUs. Furthermore, understanding the rapid evaluation methods that will be used for this study will allow other researchers and healthcare professionals to carry out similar research in ICUs and other health services.
KW - critical illness
KW - intensive care
KW - learning health systems
KW - low- and middle-income countries
KW - quality of care
KW - rapid evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188197674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18710.3
DO - 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18710.3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85188197674
SN - 2398-502X
VL - 8
JO - Wellcome Open Research
JF - Wellcome Open Research
M1 - 29
ER -