TY - JOUR
T1 - Monitoring postnatal growth of preterm infants
T2 - Present and future
AU - Giuliani, Francesca
AU - Ismail, Leila Cheikh
AU - Bertino, Enrico
AU - Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
AU - Ohuma, Eric O.
AU - Rovelli, Ilaria
AU - Conde-Agudelo, Agustin
AU - Villar, José
AU - Kennedy, Stephen H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Background: There is no consensus with regard to which charts are most suitable for monitoring the postnatal growth of preterm infants. Objective: We aimed to assess the strategies used to develop existing postnatal growth charts for preterm infants and their methodologic quality. Design: A systematic review of observational longitudinal studies, having as their primary objective the creation of postnatal growth charts for preterm infants, was conducted. Thirty-eight items distributed in 3 methodologic domains ("study design," "statistical methods," and "reporting methods") were assessed in each study. Each item was scored as a "low" or "high" risk of bias. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. A total quality score [(number of "low risk" of bias marks/total number of items assessed) 3 100%] was calculated for each study. Median (range, IQR) quality scores for each methodologic domain and for all included studies were computed. Results: Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twentyseven (44.3%) of the 61 studies scored ≥50%, of which 10 scored >60% and only 1 scored >66%. The median (range, IQR) quality score for the 61 included studies was 47% (26-75%, 34-56%). The scores for the domains study design, statistical methods, and reporting methods were 44% (19-67%, 33-52%), 25% (0-88%, 13-38%), and 33% (0-100%, 0-33%), respectively. The most common shortcomings were observed in items related to anthropometric measures (the main variable of interest), gestational age estimation, follow-up duration, reporting of postnatal care and morbidities, assessment of outliers, covariates, and chart presentation. Conclusions: The overall methodologic quality of existing longitudinal studies was fair to low. To overcome these problems, the Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study, 1 of the 3 main components of The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Project, was designed to construct preterm postnatal growth standards from a prospective cohort of "healthy" pregnancies and preterm newborns without evidence of fetal growth restriction.
AB - Background: There is no consensus with regard to which charts are most suitable for monitoring the postnatal growth of preterm infants. Objective: We aimed to assess the strategies used to develop existing postnatal growth charts for preterm infants and their methodologic quality. Design: A systematic review of observational longitudinal studies, having as their primary objective the creation of postnatal growth charts for preterm infants, was conducted. Thirty-eight items distributed in 3 methodologic domains ("study design," "statistical methods," and "reporting methods") were assessed in each study. Each item was scored as a "low" or "high" risk of bias. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. A total quality score [(number of "low risk" of bias marks/total number of items assessed) 3 100%] was calculated for each study. Median (range, IQR) quality scores for each methodologic domain and for all included studies were computed. Results: Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twentyseven (44.3%) of the 61 studies scored ≥50%, of which 10 scored >60% and only 1 scored >66%. The median (range, IQR) quality score for the 61 included studies was 47% (26-75%, 34-56%). The scores for the domains study design, statistical methods, and reporting methods were 44% (19-67%, 33-52%), 25% (0-88%, 13-38%), and 33% (0-100%, 0-33%), respectively. The most common shortcomings were observed in items related to anthropometric measures (the main variable of interest), gestational age estimation, follow-up duration, reporting of postnatal care and morbidities, assessment of outliers, covariates, and chart presentation. Conclusions: The overall methodologic quality of existing longitudinal studies was fair to low. To overcome these problems, the Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study, 1 of the 3 main components of The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Project, was designed to construct preterm postnatal growth standards from a prospective cohort of "healthy" pregnancies and preterm newborns without evidence of fetal growth restriction.
KW - Growth charts
KW - Perinatal outcomes
KW - Phenotypes
KW - Postnatal growth
KW - Preterm birth
KW - Syndrome
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956897536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3945/ajcn.114.106310
DO - 10.3945/ajcn.114.106310
M3 - Article
C2 - 26791186
AN - SCOPUS:84956897536
SN - 0002-9165
VL - 103
SP - 635S-647S
JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 2
ER -