TY - JOUR
T1 - Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
T2 - A Registry-Based Observational Study
AU - Switchenko, Nora
AU - Shukla, Vivek
AU - Mwenechanya, Musaku
AU - Chomba, Elwyn
AU - Patel, Archana
AU - Hibberd, Patricia L.
AU - Ambalavanan, Namasivayam
AU - Figueroa, Lester
AU - Mazariegos, Manolo
AU - Krebs, Nancy F.
AU - Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
AU - Derman, Richard
AU - Esamai, Fabian
AU - Liechty, Edward A.
AU - Bucher, Sheri
AU - Saleem, Sarah
AU - Goldenberg, Robert L.
AU - Lokangaka, Adrien
AU - Tshefu, Antoinette
AU - Bose, Carl L.
AU - Koso-Thomas, Marion
AU - Tan, Sylvia
AU - Nolen, Tracy
AU - McClure, Elizabeth M.
AU - Carlo, Waldemar A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Background: Newborns with hypoxemia often require lifesaving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns. Methods: This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression. Results: 177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites. Conclusions: Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.
AB - Background: Newborns with hypoxemia often require lifesaving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns. Methods: This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression. Results: 177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites. Conclusions: Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.
KW - Infants
KW - Low birth weight
KW - Low- and middle-income countries
KW - Low-resource setting
KW - Preterm infants
KW - Respiratory distress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180985339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000534777
DO - 10.1159/000534777
M3 - Article
C2 - 38048757
AN - SCOPUS:85180985339
SN - 1661-7800
VL - 121
SP - 116
EP - 124
JO - Neonatology
JF - Neonatology
IS - 1
ER -