TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients
AU - Dufour, Benjamin
AU - Duehren, Hannah M.
AU - England, Ashley Eaton
AU - Keuper, Kevin
AU - Quinn, Thomas V.
AU - Shah, Raj C.
AU - Diep, Quyen M.
AU - Gerhart, James
AU - Greenberg, Jared A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 The Authors.
PY - 2025/3/26
Y1 - 2025/3/26
N2 - OBJECTIVES: The decisions surrogates and physicians make for incapacitated critically ill patients depend in part on their expectations for patient recovery. We sought to determine whether the accuracy of surrogate and physician outcome predictions made during the ICU stay improves over time. DESIGN: Survey study. SETTING: Academic Medical Center. SUBJECTS: Surrogates and physicians of 100 mechanically ventilated patients from March 2018 to April 2019. INTERVENTIONS: At the end of the first week of mechanical ventilation and 1 week later, participants indicated on visual analog scales (0-100%) expectations that the patient would require mechanical ventilation in 1 month, require artificial nutrition in 1 month, be alive in 3 months, and be living at home in 3 months. Patient status was determined at 1 and 3 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were determined for each outcome, at each time point. Patients who died within the first month were considered to require mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition in the primary analysis. AUROCs for initial surrogate predictions were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72) for mechanical ventilation, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) for artificial nutrition, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.7) for survival, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.73) for living at home. AUROCs for initial physician predictions were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71) for mechanical ventilation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.0.83) for artificial nutrition, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) for survival, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for living at home. Average expectations among surrogates and physicians were highly stable over time; adjustments made to expectations did not result in more accurate predictions for the measured outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among surrogates and physicians of patients who were mechanically ventilated for 1 week, outcome predictions were better than would be expected by chance and not significantly improved 1 week later.
AB - OBJECTIVES: The decisions surrogates and physicians make for incapacitated critically ill patients depend in part on their expectations for patient recovery. We sought to determine whether the accuracy of surrogate and physician outcome predictions made during the ICU stay improves over time. DESIGN: Survey study. SETTING: Academic Medical Center. SUBJECTS: Surrogates and physicians of 100 mechanically ventilated patients from March 2018 to April 2019. INTERVENTIONS: At the end of the first week of mechanical ventilation and 1 week later, participants indicated on visual analog scales (0-100%) expectations that the patient would require mechanical ventilation in 1 month, require artificial nutrition in 1 month, be alive in 3 months, and be living at home in 3 months. Patient status was determined at 1 and 3 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were determined for each outcome, at each time point. Patients who died within the first month were considered to require mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition in the primary analysis. AUROCs for initial surrogate predictions were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72) for mechanical ventilation, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) for artificial nutrition, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.7) for survival, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.73) for living at home. AUROCs for initial physician predictions were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71) for mechanical ventilation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.0.83) for artificial nutrition, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) for survival, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for living at home. Average expectations among surrogates and physicians were highly stable over time; adjustments made to expectations did not result in more accurate predictions for the measured outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among surrogates and physicians of patients who were mechanically ventilated for 1 week, outcome predictions were better than would be expected by chance and not significantly improved 1 week later.
KW - ICUs
KW - decision-making
KW - mechanical
KW - prognosis
KW - receiver operating characteristic
KW - ventilators
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002306865
U2 - 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235
DO - 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002306865
SN - 2639-8028
VL - 7
SP - e1235
JO - Critical Care Explorations
JF - Critical Care Explorations
IS - 4
ER -