Perceived stigma among patients receiving antiretroviral treatment: A prospective randomised trial comparing an m-DOT strategy with standard-of- care in Kenya

Susan Kaai, Sandra Bullock, Avina Sarna, Scott Geibel, Naomi Rutenberg, Matthew Chersich, Stanley Luchters, Paul Munyao, Kishorchandra Mandaliya, Marleen Temmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

HIV and AIDS remain highly stigmatised. Modified directly observed therapy (m-DOT) supports antiretroviral treatment (ART) adherence but little is known about its association with perceived stigma in resource-constrained settings. In 2003, 234 HIV-infected adults enrolled in a two-arm randomised trial comparing a health centre-based m-DOT strategy with standard self-administration of ART. Data on perceived stigma were collected using Berger's HIV stigma scale prior to starting ART and after 12 months. This was a secondary analysis to examine whether perceived stigma was related to treatment delivery. Perceived stigma scores declined after 12 months of treatment from a mean of 44.9 (sd=7.6) to a mean of 41.4 (sd=7.7), (t=6.14, P<0.001). No differences were found between the mean scores of participants in both study arms. Also, no difference in scores was detected using GLM, controlling for socio-demographic characteristics and baseline scores. Findings indicate that a well managed clinic-based m-DOT does not increase perceived HIV-related stigma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-70
Number of pages9
JournalSahara J
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Attitudes
  • Directly observed therapy
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Perceived stigma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceived stigma among patients receiving antiretroviral treatment: A prospective randomised trial comparing an m-DOT strategy with standard-of- care in Kenya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this