TY - JOUR
T1 - Perioperative steroids for lumbar disc surgery
T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Waqas, Muhammad
AU - Shallwani, Hussain
AU - Shamim, Muhammad
AU - Ahmad, Khabir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Surgical Neurology International | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background: Our review question was 'Does perioperative steroids administration, in comparison with other treatments or placebo, improve either postoperative pain control, length of hospital stay, or return to work in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery?' Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL PLUS, and Cochrane databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) studying the role of steroids for lumbar disc surgery. Studies that compared perioperative steroids with other treatments or placebo were included. Study outcomes included postoperative back pain, leg pain, length of hospital stay, and return to work. Data was extracted through a proforma. Means and mean differences were calculated for continuous data, whereas odds ratios were calculated for dichotomous data. Data were analyzed with the help of Rev Man 5. Results: Twenty RCTs were included in the review. Quantitative analysis could be performed on 19 RCTs. Intraoperative steroids improve control of back pain at 24-48 hours. Although there was some benefit of steroid administration in controlling postoperative leg pain, it disappeared at 1 year and in the overall pooled analysis. The length of hospital stay was much shorter in the steroid group. The frequency of adverse events and complications also favored steroid administration. Conclusion: Intraoperative epidural steroid administration offers some benefit in pain control with a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of oral and intravenous steroids in the perioperative period.
AB - Background: Our review question was 'Does perioperative steroids administration, in comparison with other treatments or placebo, improve either postoperative pain control, length of hospital stay, or return to work in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery?' Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL PLUS, and Cochrane databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) studying the role of steroids for lumbar disc surgery. Studies that compared perioperative steroids with other treatments or placebo were included. Study outcomes included postoperative back pain, leg pain, length of hospital stay, and return to work. Data was extracted through a proforma. Means and mean differences were calculated for continuous data, whereas odds ratios were calculated for dichotomous data. Data were analyzed with the help of Rev Man 5. Results: Twenty RCTs were included in the review. Quantitative analysis could be performed on 19 RCTs. Intraoperative steroids improve control of back pain at 24-48 hours. Although there was some benefit of steroid administration in controlling postoperative leg pain, it disappeared at 1 year and in the overall pooled analysis. The length of hospital stay was much shorter in the steroid group. The frequency of adverse events and complications also favored steroid administration. Conclusion: Intraoperative epidural steroid administration offers some benefit in pain control with a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of oral and intravenous steroids in the perioperative period.
KW - Lumbar surgery
KW - Lumbar surgery outcomes
KW - Microdiscectomy
KW - Perioperative steroids
KW - Randomized control trials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020390383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/sni.sni_478_16
DO - 10.4103/sni.sni_478_16
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85020390383
SN - 2152-7806
VL - 8
JO - Surgical Neurology International
JF - Surgical Neurology International
IS - 1
ER -