TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmaceutical industry relationships with oncologists in sub-Saharan Africa
AU - Rubagumya, Fidel
AU - Mutebi, Miriam
AU - Manirakiza, Achille
AU - Abdihamid, Omar
AU - Mushonga, Melinda
AU - Vanderpuye, Verna
AU - Hammad, Nazik
AU - Booth, Christopher M.
N1 - Funding Information:
In our experience, many oncologists in Africa are unaware of potential conflicts of interest that might occur because of relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Even when they do become aware, the relative financial gain is so substantial that it can be difficult to curtail these interactions. Current cancer experts in Africa attend and give lectures sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry, receive company funding to attend cancer conferences, receive honoraria for joining advisory boards, and receive funding for research. Despite this multitude of interactions, oncologists in sub-Saharan Africa are not required to declare their conflicts of interest to the hospitals or universities where they work in which there are no policies mandating reporting. Among the collective countries of origin of the authors of this Personal View (ie, Rwanda, Kenya, Zimbabwe, Burundi, Sudan, and Ghana), there are no hospital, national, or association organisations that have conflicts of interest declaration policies. Outside our own countries, we are not aware of any country in sub-Saharan Africa that has these policies. As industry–doctor relationships become more commonplace, oncologists in sub-Saharan Africa should challenge statements made by key opinion leaders that are not supported by strong evidence.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Health-care systems in sub-Saharan Africa are considered to be new markets for pharmaceutical companies. This perception is particularly relevant within oncology, as the pharmaceutical industry has changed strategic priorities in the past 10 years to focus on cancer. Since the 1930s, pharmaceutical companies have used advertisements, sample drugs, gifts, paid speaking engagements, advisory boards, and trips to conferences to influence clinical practice and policy. A large amount of literature describes the commonness of these practices and their effects on the behaviour of doctors. However, these data come almost exclusively from high-income countries. Industry–doctor relationships are increasingly common in sub-Saharan Africa and other low-income and middle-income countries. Although there are undoubtedly risks of industry engagement in low-income and middle-income countries, many programmes with educational, research, and clinical value would not occur in these countries without industry support. Thus, what is known about these relationships in high-income countries will not necessarily apply in low-income and middle-income countries. There is a need for widespread discussion about industry–oncologist interactions across the African continent and context-specific data to understand the potential risks and benefits of these relationships.
AB - Health-care systems in sub-Saharan Africa are considered to be new markets for pharmaceutical companies. This perception is particularly relevant within oncology, as the pharmaceutical industry has changed strategic priorities in the past 10 years to focus on cancer. Since the 1930s, pharmaceutical companies have used advertisements, sample drugs, gifts, paid speaking engagements, advisory boards, and trips to conferences to influence clinical practice and policy. A large amount of literature describes the commonness of these practices and their effects on the behaviour of doctors. However, these data come almost exclusively from high-income countries. Industry–doctor relationships are increasingly common in sub-Saharan Africa and other low-income and middle-income countries. Although there are undoubtedly risks of industry engagement in low-income and middle-income countries, many programmes with educational, research, and clinical value would not occur in these countries without industry support. Thus, what is known about these relationships in high-income countries will not necessarily apply in low-income and middle-income countries. There is a need for widespread discussion about industry–oncologist interactions across the African continent and context-specific data to understand the potential risks and benefits of these relationships.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147235048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00639-8
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00639-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36725154
AN - SCOPUS:85147235048
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 24
SP - e96-e101
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 2
ER -